Test-Retest Reliability of the Generalized Pain Questionnaire in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Preliminary Reference Values for Non-Clinical and Several Clinical Samples

被引:0
|
作者
Jansen, Niels [1 ]
ten Klooster, Peter M. [2 ]
Vonkeman, Harald E. [3 ]
Buitenweg, Jan R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Biomed Signals & Syst, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Psychol Hlth & Technol, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Med Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2023年 / 16卷
关键词
generalized pain hypersensitivity; widespread pain; preliminary reference values; reliability; face validity; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; FIBROMYALGIA; PAINDETECT;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S430280
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Generalized pain hypersensitivity is a characteristic feature in many different types of chronic pain. Recently, a 7-item self-reported Generalized Pain Questionnaire (GPQ) was developed to evaluate the presence and severity of generalized pain hypersensitivity in chronic pain patients. Here, we evaluate the test-retest reliability of the GPQ and report on preliminary reference values for various patient groups and healthy subjects. Methods: Eighty-five patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) completed the GPQ twice over a 2-week interval. Relative and absolute indicators of reliability were determined using data of 69 patients (81.2% retest response rate). Using readily available datasets, preliminary reference data were established in two nonclinical populations (NCP1; N = 30 and NCP2; N = 111), and for patients diagnosed with RA (N = 114), gout (N = 97), fibromyalgia (N=98), or neuropathy (N = 25), or participants in a pain Results: Total GPQ scores had an ICC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.86). While no systematic or proportional differences were found for the GPQ total score; two (near-)significant systematic differences were observed for the individual questions. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 2.22 and 6.2, respectively. Mean +/- SD scores were found to be 0.8 +/- 1.2 (NCP1), 4.0 +/- 4.6 (NCP2), 6.4 +/- 5.5 (Gout), 6.5 +/- 5.1 (RA), 8.1 +/- 4.5 (Neuropathy), 13.6 +/- 4.0 (Rehabilitation) and 16.0 +/- 5.0 (Fibromyalgia). Discussion: This study shows that the GPQ has acceptable reliability to be used as a tool to evaluate the presence and intensity of generalized pain hypersensitivity. The absolute measures of reliability and the preliminary reference values reported here aid in the interpretation of future studies with the GPQ.
引用
收藏
页码:4127 / 4137
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Rasch analysis and test-retest reliability
    Rifbjerg-Madsen, Signe
    Waehrens, Eva Ejlersen
    Danneskiold-Samsoe, Bente
    Amris, Kirstine
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [2] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dutch Injustice Experience Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Pain
    Bults, R. M.
    Reneman, M. F.
    van Wilgen, C. P.
    Preuper, H. R. Schiphorst
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, 2020, 13 (03): : 316 - 325
  • [3] Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Rasch analysis and test-retest reliability
    Signe Rifbjerg-Madsen
    Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens
    Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe
    Kirstine Amris
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15
  • [4] The Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Preliminary Norms, Internal Consistency, and Test-Retest Reliability
    Dargie, Emma
    Holden, Ronald R.
    Pukall, Caroline F.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (12): : 1585 - 1596
  • [5] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dutch Injustice Experience Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Pain
    R. M. Bults
    M. F. Reneman
    C. P. van Wilgen
    H. R. Schiphorst Preuper
    Psychological Injury and Law, 2020, 13 : 316 - 325
  • [6] The Quality of Life in Care questionnaire: An assessment of feasibility, test-retest reliability and responsiveness in a clinical sample
    Upton, Penney
    Maddocks, Alison
    Barnes, Peter
    Meeuwsen, Mirjam
    VULNERABLE CHILDREN AND YOUTH STUDIES, 2013, 8 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [7] The interrater and test-retest reliability of 3 modalities of quantitative sensory testing in healthy adults and people with chronic low back pain or rheumatoid arthritis
    Brady, Sophia M.
    Georgopoulos, Vasileios
    van Zanten, Jet J. C. S. Veldhuijzen
    Duda, Joan L.
    Metsios, George S.
    Kitas, George D.
    Fenton, Sally A. M.
    Walsh, David A.
    Mcwilliams, Daniel F.
    PAIN REPORTS, 2023, 8 (06) : E1102
  • [8] INTERCORRELATION AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE PAIN DISABILITY INDEX (PDI) AND THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE (ODQ) AND THEIR CORRELATION WITH PAIN INTENSITY IN LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENTS
    GRONBLAD, M
    HUPLI, M
    WENNERSTRAND, P
    JARVINEN, E
    LUKINMAA, A
    KOURI, JP
    KARAHARJU, EO
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1993, 9 (03): : 189 - 195
  • [9] Turkish Version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and Validity Analysis in Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples
    Yavuz, Fatih
    Ulusoy, Sevinc
    Iskin, Mehtap
    Esen, Fatma Betul
    Burhan, Huseyin Sehid
    Karadere, Mehmet Emrah
    Yavuz, Nuran
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04): : 397 - 408
  • [10] The test-retest reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the Dubousset Functional Test and its correlation with Rolland Morris disability questionnaire in chronic non-specific low back pain
    Tuba Unver
    Bayram Unver
    Kevser Sevik Kacmaz
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 2086 - 2092