共 50 条
Statin Use and Coronary Artery Calcification: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
被引:7
作者:
Shahraki, Mitra Nekouei
[1
]
Jouabadi, Soroush Mohammadi
[1
,2
]
Bos, Daniel
[1
,3
]
Stricker, Bruno H.
[1
]
Ahmadizar, Fariba
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Div Vasc Med & Pharmacol, Dept Internal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Data Sci & Biostat, Julius Global Hlth, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词:
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors;
HMG-CoA;
Statins;
Coronary vessels;
Vascular calcification;
LIPID-LOWERING TREATMENT;
NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE;
CALCIUM SCORE;
RISK-FACTORS;
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK;
PLAQUE BURDEN;
HEART-DISEASE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PROGRESSION;
D O I:
10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w
中图分类号:
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100210 ;
摘要:
Purpose of ReviewThis review aimed to determine the association between statin use and coronary artery calcification (CAC), as detected by computed tomography in the general population, in previously published observational studies (OSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Recent FindingsA systematic search until February 2022 identified 41 relevant studies, comprising 29 OSs and 12 RCTs. We employed six meta-analysis models, stratifying studies based on design and effect metrics. For cohort studies, the pooled beta of the association with CAC quantified by the Agatston score was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.05; 0.16), with an average follow-up time per person (AFTP) of 3.68 years. Cross-sectional studies indicated a pooled odds ratio of 2.11 (95% CI = 1.61; 2.78) for the presence of CAC. In RCTs, the pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for CAC, quantified by Agatston score or volume, over and AFTP of 1.25 years were not statistically significant (SMD = - 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.19; 0.06 and SMD = 0.26, 95% CI = - 0.66; 1.19), but significantly different (p-value = 0.04). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses did not show any significant differences in pooled estimates across covariates.SummaryThe effect of statins on CAC differs across study designs. OSs demonstrate associations between statin use and higher CAC scores and presence while being prone to confounding by indication. Effects from RCTs do not reach statistical significance and vary depending on the quantification method, hampering drawing conclusions. Further investigations are required to address the limitations inherent in each approach.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 784
页数:16
相关论文