Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network

被引:9
作者
Qian, Nini [1 ]
Jiang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Yu [1 ]
Zhu, Jian [3 ]
Qiu, Jianfeng [4 ]
Yu, Hui [1 ]
Huang, Xian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Precis Instrument & Optoelect Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, 20 Yuhuangding East Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol Phys & Technol, Jiyan Rd, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong First Med Univ & Shandong Acad Med Sci, Med Engn & Technol Res Ctr, Tai An 271000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Deep learning; Contrast media; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; MRI; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10170-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop an end-to-end deep neural network for the classification of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to facilitate breast cancer diagnosis in the clinic.MethodsIn this retrospective mono-centric study, patients who underwent CEM examinations from January 2019 to August 2021 were enrolled. A multi-feature fusion network combining low-energy (LE) and dual-energy subtracted (DES) images and dual view, as well as bilateral information, was trained and tested using a large CEM dataset with a diversity of breast tumors for breast lesion classification. Its generalization performance was further evaluated on two external datasets. Results were reported using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsA total of 2496 patients (mean age, 53 years & PLUSMN; 12 (standard deviation)) were included and divided into a training set (1718), a validation set (255), and a testing set (523). The proposed CEM-based multi-feature fusion network achieved the best diagnosis performance with an AUC of 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95, 0.97), compared with the no-fusion model, the left-right fusion model, and the multi-feature fusion network with only LE image inputs. Our models reached an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94) on a full-field digital mammograph (FFDM) external dataset (86 patients), and an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) on a CEM external dataset (193 patients).ConclusionThe developed multi-feature fusion neural network achieved high performance in CEM image classification and was able to facilitate CEM-based breast cancer diagnosis.Clinical relevance statementCompared with low-energy images, CEM images have greater sensitivity and similar specificity in malignant breast lesion detection. The multi-feature fusion neural network is a promising computer-aided diagnostic tool for the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.Key Points & BULL; Deep convolutional neural networks have the potential to facilitate contrast-enhanced mammography-based breast cancer diagnosis.& BULL; The multi-feature fusion neural network reaches high accuracies in the classification of contrast-enhanced mammography images.& BULL; The developed model is a promising diagnostic tool to facilitate clinical breast cancer diagnosis.Key Points & BULL; Deep convolutional neural networks have the potential to facilitate contrast-enhanced mammography-based breast cancer diagnosis.& BULL; The multi-feature fusion neural network reaches high accuracies in the classification of contrast-enhanced mammography images.& BULL; The developed model is a promising diagnostic tool to facilitate clinical breast cancer diagnosis.Key Points & BULL; Deep convolutional neural networks have the potential to facilitate contrast-enhanced mammography-based breast cancer diagnosis.& BULL; The multi-feature fusion neural network reaches high accuracies in the classification of contrast-enhanced mammography images.& BULL; The developed model is a promising diagnostic tool to facilitate clinical breast cancer diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 927
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020
    Cao, Wei
    Chen, Hong-Da
    Yu, Yi-Wen
    Li, Ni
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (07) : 783 - 791
  • [2] Grad-CAM plus plus : Generalized Gradient-based Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks
    Chattopadhay, Aditya
    Sarkar, Anirban
    Howlader, Prantik
    Balasubramanian, Vineeth N.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE WINTER CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER VISION (WACV 2018), 2018, : 839 - 847
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis
    Cheung, Yun-Chung
    Lin, Yu-Ching
    Wan, Yung-Liang
    Yeow, Kee-Min
    Huang, Pei-Chin
    Lo, Yung-Feng
    Tsai, Hsiu-Pei
    Ueng, Shir-Hwa
    Chang, Chee-Jen
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2394 - 2403
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508
  • [5] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions
    del Mar Travieso-Aja, Maria
    Maldonado-Saluzzi, Daniel
    Naranjo-Santana, Pedro
    Fernandez-Ruiz, Claudia
    Severino-Rondon, Wilsa
    Rodriguez Rodriguez, Mario
    Vega Benitez, Victor
    Perez-Luzardo, Octavio
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (10): : 1006 - 1017
  • [6] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    Schmitzberger, Florian F.
    Amer, Heba
    Ingold-Heppner, Barbara
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Diekmann, Felix
    Engelken, Florian
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Renz, Diane M.
    Bick, Ulrich
    Hamm, Bernd
    Dromain, Clarisse
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (07) : 2752 - 2764
  • [8] Fully Automated Support System for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images
    Fanizzi, Annarita
    Losurdo, Liliana
    Basile, Teresa Maria A.
    Bellotti, Roberto
    Bottigli, Ubaldo
    Delogu, Pasquale
    Diacono, Domenico
    Didonna, Vittorio
    Fausto, Alfonso
    Lombardi, Angela
    Lorusso, Vito
    Massafra, Raffaella
    Tangaro, Sabina
    La Forgia, Daniele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (06)
  • [9] SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis
    Gao, Fei
    Wu, Teresa
    Li, Jing
    Zheng, Bin
    Ruan, Lingxiang
    Shang, Desheng
    Patel, Bhavika
    [J]. COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2018, 70 : 53 - 62
  • [10] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance
    Hobbs, Max M.
    Taylor, Donna B.
    Buzynski, Sebastian
    Peake, Rachel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 59 (03) : 300 - 305