A Test of Autonomy Restoration Postscripts to Mitigate Psychological Reactance to an Opt-Out Organ Donor Registry in the United States

被引:6
作者
Quick, Brian L. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Kriss, Lauren A. [3 ]
Morrow, Ethan [4 ]
Hartman, Dan [4 ]
Koester, Brenda [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Commun, Champaign, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Carle Illinois Coll Med, Champaign, IL USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Commun, Champaign, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Commun, Lincoln Hall,702 S Wright St 3001, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Carle Illinois Coll Med, Lincoln Hall,702 S Wright St 3001, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
CLEAN INDOOR AIR; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; HEALTH MESSAGES; DONATION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; PERCEPTIONS; CAMPAIGNS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1080/10410236.2023.2232607
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The organ shortage continues to present problems around the world including the United States. In response, some countries have switched from an opt-in organ donor registry to an opt-out registry. The United States currently utilizes an opt-in registry where an individual is not considered an organ donor until they register their intentions. In the current study, U.S. adults were randomly assigned to a 2 (message valence: promotional, refutational) x 2 (autonomy restoration postscript: present, not present) x 2 (social proof: high likes, low likes) posttest only control group design evaluating social media message regarding an opt-out organ donor registry for implementation in the U.S. Results revealed an interaction between message valence and autonomy on freedom threat perceptions toward the message. Consistent with psychological reactance theory, freedom threat perceptions were positively associated with reactance, which in turn was positively associated with an intention to sign a petition and call a representative to voice disapproval of the opt-out organ donor registry. The discussion is focused on pragmatic recommendations for organ donor practitioners and advocates as well as the theoretical contributions to reactance theory.
引用
收藏
页码:1714 / 1726
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of Opt-out Versus Opt-in Consent on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation (2006-2016) [J].
Ahmad, M. Usman ;
Hanna, Afif ;
Mohamed, Ahmed-Zayn ;
Schlindwein, Alex ;
Pley, Caitlin ;
Bahner, Ingrid ;
Mhaskar, Rahul ;
Pettigrew, Gavin J. ;
Jarmi, Tambi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (12) :3161-3171
[2]   Examining the Attitude-Behavior Relationship in Prosocial Donation Domains [J].
Anker, Ashley E. ;
Feeley, Thomas Hugh ;
Kim, Hyunjung .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 40 (06) :1293-1324
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance
[4]   Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems [J].
Arshad, Adam ;
Anderson, Benjamin ;
Sharif, Adnan .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 95 (06) :1453-1460
[5]   Why Do Some Americans Resist COVID-19 Prevention Behavior? An Analysis of Issue Importance, Message Fatigue, and Reactance Regarding COVID-19 Messaging [J].
Ball, Hannah ;
Wozniak, Tayah Renea .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2022, 37 (14) :1812-1819
[6]  
Bessarabova E, 2017, WESTERN J COMM, V81, P385, DOI 10.1080/10570314.2016.1254815
[7]   Reactance, Restoration, and Cognitive Structure: Comparative Statics [J].
Bessarabova, Elena ;
Fink, Edward L. ;
Turner, Monique .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (03) :339-364
[8]   Experimental Evidence of Observed Social Media Status Cues on Perceived Likability [J].
Bradley, Steven W. ;
Roberts, James A. ;
Bradley, Preston W. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA CULTURE, 2019, 8 (01) :41-51
[9]  
Brehm Jack W., 1966, A theory of psychological reactance
[10]  
Brehm S., 1981, Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control