Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

被引:7
作者
Kweon, Young-Ran [1 ,3 ]
Park, Jungrim [2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Nursing, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Wonju, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Gwangju 61469, South Korea
关键词
Design thinking; Nursing students; Peer review; Team-based learning; Validation study; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. Objectives: To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. Design: A cross-sectional methodological study. Setting: Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Participants: Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. Methods: The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reli-ability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. Results: A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. Conclusions: This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of team-based learning in nursing education: A systematic review
    Alberti, Sara
    Motta, Paolo
    Ferri, Paola
    Bonetti, Loris
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 97
  • [2] Design Thinking in Health Care
    Altman, Myra
    Huang, Terry T. K.
    Breland, Jessica Y.
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2018, 15
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, INTRO DESIGN THINKIN, P1
  • [4] PEER ASSESSMENT IN SMALL GROUPS: A COMPARISON OF METHODS
    Baker, Diane F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2008, 32 (02) : 183 - 209
  • [5] Peer assessment to improve medical student's contributions to team-based projects: randomised controlled trial and qualitative follow-up
    Biesma, Regien
    Kennedy, Mary-Claire
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Brugha, Ruairi
    Conroy, Ronan
    Doyle, Frank
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [6] Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity?
    Binnewies, Carmen
    Ohly, Sandra
    Sonnentag, Sabine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 16 (04) : 432 - 455
  • [7] Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
    Burgess, Annette
    Roberts, Chris
    Lane, Andrew Stuart
    Haq, Inam
    Clark, Tyler
    Kalman, Eszter
    Pappalardo, Nicole
    Bleasel, Jane
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Feedback in the clinical setting
    Burgess, Annette
    van Diggele, Christie
    Roberts, Chris
    Mellis, Craig
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (Suppl 2)
  • [9] Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance
    Burgess, Annette
    Mellis, Craig
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2015, 6 : 373 - 381
  • [10] Cairney J., 2015, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA