Heparin Loading Dose in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Jiawei [1 ]
Sun, Peng [1 ]
Liu, Lina [1 ]
Liu, Zhanxiao [1 ]
Wang, Xudong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 15 Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
anticoagulation; cardiac arrest; extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR); hemorrhagic complications; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; ADULT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the differences in hemorrhagic and embolic complications among extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients who received and did not receive a loading dose of heparin.Design: This study is a controlled before-after monocentric retrospective study.Setting: The emergency department of the Aerospace Center Hospital (ASCH).Participants: The authors studied a total of 28 patients who, after a cardiac arrest, underwent ECPR in the emergency department of the ASCH from January 2018 to May 2022.Interventions: The authors compared the hemorrhagic and embolic complications and prognosis of the 2 groups based on whether they received a loading dose of heparin anticoagulation therapy before catheterization (a loading-dose group and a non-loading dose-group).Measurements and Main Results: There were 12 patients in the loading-dose group and 16 in the nonloading-dose group. There was no statisti-cally significant difference in age, sex, underlying diseases, causes of cardiac arrest, and hypoperfusion time between the 2 groups. The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 75% in the loading-dose group and 67.5% in the nonloading-dose group. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The incidence of life-threatening massive hemorrhage in the loading-dose group was 50%, and in the nonloading-dose group, it was 12.5%. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The incidence of embolic com-plications in the loading-dose group and nonloading-dose group was 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The survival rates of the 2 groups were 8.3% v 18.8%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).Conclusion: In conclusion, in the authors' study of patients undergoing ECPR, administering a loading dose of heparin was associated with an increased risk of early fatal hemorrhage. However, stopping this loading dose did not raise the risk of embolic complications. It also did not lower the risk of total hemorrhage and transfusion.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality in Classic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Events Using Video Review*
    Taeb, Mahsheed
    Levin, Amanda B.
    Spaeder, Michael C.
    Schwartz, Jamie M.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (09) : 831 - 838
  • [42] Perioperative Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Patients: A Review for the Perioperative Physician
    Panda, Kunal
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Mazzeffi, Michael
    Gu, Yang
    Wood, Katherine L.
    Moitra, Vivek K.
    Wu, Isaac Y.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 140 (05) : 1026 - 1042
  • [43] Clinical Significance of Low-Flow Time in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Results from the RESCUE Registry
    Park, Ik Hyun
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Jang, Woo Jin
    Chun, Woo Jung
    Oh, Ju Hyeon
    Park, Yong Hwan
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    Kim, Hyun-Joong
    Kim, Bum Sung
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Lee, Hyun Jong
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (11) : 1 - 12
  • [44] Favorable prognosis by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for subsequent shockable rhythm patients
    Fukushima, Kazunori
    Aoki, Makoto
    Nakajima, Jun
    Aramaki, Yuto
    Ichikawa, Yumi
    Isshiki, Yuta
    Sawada, Yusuke
    Oshima, Kiyohiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 53 : 144 - 149
  • [45] Application of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult patients with refractory cardiac arrest
    Guo, Ji-Ge
    Cao, Jie
    Zhang, Wei-Min
    Meng, Fan-Gang
    Zhang, Zheng
    Xu, Bi-Jun
    Qian, Xi-Ming
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (02) : 831 - 836
  • [46] Current animal models of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review
    Ijuin, Shinichi
    Liu, Keibun
    Gill, Denzil
    Ro, Sun Kyun
    Vukovic, Jana
    Ishihara, Satoshi
    Belohlavek, Jan
    Li Bassi, Gianluigi
    Suen, Jacky Y.
    Fraser, John F.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2023, 15
  • [47] Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Establishment of a Sustainable Program
    Cassara, Chris M.
    Long, Micah T.
    Dollerschell, John T.
    Chae, Floria
    Hall, David J.
    Demiralp, Gozde
    Stampfl, Matthew J.
    Bernardoni, Brittney
    McCarthy, Daniel P.
    Glazer, Joshua M.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (12):
  • [48] Predictors of neurological outcomes after successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Ryu, Jeong-Am
    Cho, Yang Hyun
    Sung, Kiick
    Choi, Seung Hyuk
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Choi, Jin-Ho
    Lee, Dae-Sang
    Yang, Ji-Hyuk
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [49] What is extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation?
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Montisci, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (06) : 1415 - 1419
  • [50] Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Adults: Evolving Evidence
    Kehrl, Thompson
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (04) : 364 - 369