An Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources for Developing a Sustainable and Low-Carbon Hydrogen Economy in China

被引:13
作者
Liu, Runkun [1 ]
Solangi, Yasir Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Finance & Stat, Changsha 410006, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
关键词
renewable energy sources; hydrogen economy; low-carbon energy; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; China; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/pr11041225
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A significant effort is required to reduce China's dependency on fossil fuels while also supporting worldwide efforts to reduce climate change and develop hydrogen energy systems. A hydrogen economy must include renewable energy sources (RESs), which can offer a clean and sustainable energy source for producing hydrogen. This study uses an integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate and rank renewable energy sources for developing a hydrogen economy in China. This is a novel approach because it can capture the uncertainty and vagueness in the decision-making process and provide a comprehensive and robust evaluation of the alternatives. Moreover, it considers multiple criteria and sub-criteria that reflect the environmental, economic, technical, social, and political aspects of RESs from the perspective of a hydrogen economy. This study identified five major criteria, fifteen sub-criteria, and six RES alternatives for hydrogen production. This integrated approach uses fuzzy AHP to evaluate and rank the criteria and sub-criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to identify the most suitable and feasible RES. The results show that environmental, economic, and technical criteria are the most important criteria. Solar, wind, and hydropower are the top three RES alternatives that are most suitable and feasible. Furthermore, biomass, geothermal, and tidal energy were ranked lower, which might be due to the limitations and challenges in their adoption and performance in the context of the criteria and sub-criteria used for the analysis. This study's findings add to the literature on guidelines to strategize for renewable energy adoption for the hydrogen economy in China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [11] Strong transitivity, rationality and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons
    Gogus, O
    Boucher, TO
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 94 (01) : 133 - 144
  • [12] Employment creation potential of renewable power generation technologies: A life cycle approach
    Hondo, Hiroki
    Moriizumi, Yue
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 128 - 136
  • [13] IEA, 2022, World Energy Statistics and Balances
  • [14] Jankauskas Vidmantas, 2014, Energetika, V60, P113
  • [15] China's carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: A critical review
    Jiang, Kai
    Ashworth, Peta
    Zhang, Shiyi
    Liang, Xi
    Sun, Yan
    Angus, Daniel
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 119 (119)
  • [16] A novel Pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development
    Kamali Saraji, Mahyar
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Ciegis, Remigijus
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (01)
  • [17] Evaluation of energy production technologies from biomass using analytical hierarchy process: The case of Iran
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi
    Naji, S. Ali
    Najafi, Fatemeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 232 : 257 - 265
  • [18] Kulkarni S.H., 2017, DISTRIB GENER ALTERN, V32, P29, DOI [10.1080/21563306.2017.11869108, DOI 10.1080/21563306.2017.11869108]
  • [19] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan
    Lee, Hsing-Chen
    Chang, Ching-Ter
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 : 883 - 896
  • [20] Evaluating the Factors of Green Finance to Achieve Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Targets in China: A Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach
    Li, Chaofeng
    Solangi, Yasir Ahmed
    Ali, Sharafat
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)