An Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources for Developing a Sustainable and Low-Carbon Hydrogen Economy in China

被引:13
作者
Liu, Runkun [1 ]
Solangi, Yasir Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Finance & Stat, Changsha 410006, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
关键词
renewable energy sources; hydrogen economy; low-carbon energy; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; China; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/pr11041225
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A significant effort is required to reduce China's dependency on fossil fuels while also supporting worldwide efforts to reduce climate change and develop hydrogen energy systems. A hydrogen economy must include renewable energy sources (RESs), which can offer a clean and sustainable energy source for producing hydrogen. This study uses an integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate and rank renewable energy sources for developing a hydrogen economy in China. This is a novel approach because it can capture the uncertainty and vagueness in the decision-making process and provide a comprehensive and robust evaluation of the alternatives. Moreover, it considers multiple criteria and sub-criteria that reflect the environmental, economic, technical, social, and political aspects of RESs from the perspective of a hydrogen economy. This study identified five major criteria, fifteen sub-criteria, and six RES alternatives for hydrogen production. This integrated approach uses fuzzy AHP to evaluate and rank the criteria and sub-criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to identify the most suitable and feasible RES. The results show that environmental, economic, and technical criteria are the most important criteria. Solar, wind, and hydropower are the top three RES alternatives that are most suitable and feasible. Furthermore, biomass, geothermal, and tidal energy were ranked lower, which might be due to the limitations and challenges in their adoption and performance in the context of the criteria and sub-criteria used for the analysis. This study's findings add to the literature on guidelines to strategize for renewable energy adoption for the hydrogen economy in China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable and nuclear resources for. electricity generation in Kazakhstan
    Ahmad, Salman
    Nadeem, Abid
    Akhanova, Gulzhanat
    Houghton, Tom
    Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 1880 - 1891
  • [2] Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia
    Ahmad, Salman
    Tahar, Razman Mat
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 : 458 - 466
  • [3] Strategic analysis of single-use plastic ban policy for environmental sustainability: the case of Pakistan
    Ali, Sharafat
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Solangi, Yasir Ahmed
    Sharif, Chaudhry Imran
    Zarei, Nasibeh
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2022, 24 (03) : 843 - 849
  • [4] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to solve renewable energy technology selection problem for Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh
    Ali, Tausif
    Nahian, Ahmed Jaudat
    Ma, Hongzhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
  • [5] Large-scale storage of hydrogen
    Andersson, Joakim
    Gronkvist, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (23) : 11901 - 11919
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2021, CHINA BUS REV, V18, P44
  • [7] A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY BASED UPON THE INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY SETS FOR EVALUATING RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES IN TURKEY
    Balin, Abit
    Baracli, Hayri
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (05) : 742 - 763
  • [8] Current trends and prospects of tidal energy technology
    Chowdhury, M. S.
    Rahman, Kazi Sajedur
    Selvanathan, Vidhya
    Nuthammachot, Narissara
    Suklueng, Montri
    Mostafaeipour, Ali
    Habib, Asiful
    Akhtaruzzaman
    Amin, Nowshad
    Techato, Kuaanan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (06) : 8179 - 8194
  • [9] Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers
    Egli, Florian
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140
  • [10] A multi-objective decision-making approach for sustainable energy investment planning
    Ervural, Beyzanur Cayir
    Evren, Ramazan
    Delen, Dursun
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 126 : 387 - 402