Statistical Misconceptions, Awareness, and Attitudes towards Open Science Practices in Slovak Psychology Researchers

被引:0
作者
Rajcani, Jakub [1 ]
Vargova, Lenka [2 ]
Adamkovic, Matus [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kacmar, Pavol [5 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Gondova 2, Bratislava 81102, Slovakia
[2] Univ Presov, Inst Psychol, Fac Arts, 17 Novembra 1, Presov 08001, Slovakia
[3] Ctr Social & Psychol Sci SAS, Inst Social Sci, Sancova 56, Bratislava 81105, Slovakia
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Keskussairaalantie 2, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ Kosice, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Srobarova 2, Kosice 04059, Slovakia
关键词
survey; statistical misconceptions; reproducibility; replicability; open science practices; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; P-VALUES; INCENTIVES; ABSENCE; TRUTH; TESTS;
D O I
10.31577/sp.2023.01.866
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the years following the reproducibility crisis in behavioral sciences, increased attention of the scientific community has been dedicated to the correct application of statistical inference and promotion of open science practices. In the present survey, we contacted psychology researchers, lecturers, and doctoral students from all universities in Slovakia and the Slovak Academy of Sciences via email. Together we re-ceived answers from 65 participants. Questions in the survey covered the most common misconceptions about statistical hypothesis testing, as well as awareness, attitudes, and barriers related to the adherence to open science practices. We found a high prevalence of statistical misconceptions, namely related to the interpretation of p-values and interpretation of null results. At the same time, participants indicated mostly positive attitudes towards open science practices, such as data sharing and preregistration, and were highly interested in further training. These results provide an insight into the needs of the Slovak psychology research community. This is an important step in the further dissemination of open science practices and the prevention of common statistical and methodological errors.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
    Aarts, Alexander A.
    Anderson, Joanna E.
    Anderson, Christopher J.
    Attridge, Peter R.
    Attwood, Angela
    Axt, Jordan
    Babel, Molly
    Bahnik, Stepan
    Baranski, Erica
    Barnett-Cowan, Michael
    Bartmess, Elizabeth
    Beer, Jennifer
    Bell, Raoul
    Bentley, Heather
    Beyan, Leah
    Binion, Grace
    Borsboom, Denny
    Bosch, Annick
    Bosco, Frank A.
    Bowman, Sara D.
    Brandt, Mark J.
    Braswell, Erin
    Brohmer, Hilmar
    Brown, Benjamin T.
    Brown, Kristina
    Bruening, Jovita
    Calhoun-Sauls, Ann
    Callahan, Shannon P.
    Chagnon, Elizabeth
    Chandler, Jesse
    Chartier, Christopher R.
    Cheung, Felix
    Christopherson, Cody D.
    Cillessen, Linda
    Clay, Russ
    Cleary, Hayley
    Cloud, Mark D.
    Cohn, Michael
    Cohoon, Johanna
    Columbus, Simon
    Cordes, Andreas
    Costantini, Giulio
    Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet
    Cremata, Ed
    Crusius, Jan
    DeCoster, Jamie
    DeGaetano, Michelle A.
    Della Penna, Nicolas
    den Bezemer, Bobby
    Deserno, Marie K.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
  • [2] Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing A Survey Among Members of the German Psychological Society
    Abele-Brehm, Andrea E.
    Gollwitzer, Mario
    Steinberg, Ulf
    Schoenbrodt, Felix D.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 50 (04) : 252 - 260
  • [3] Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation
    Aczel, Balazs
    Palfi, Bence
    Szollosi, Aba
    Kovacs, Marton
    Szaszi, Barnabas
    Szecsi, Peter
    Zrubka, Mark
    Gronau, Quentin F.
    van den Bergh, Don
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 1 (03) : 357 - 366
  • [4] Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists
    Agnoli, Franca
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    Veldkamp, Coosje L. S.
    Albiero, Paolo
    Cubelli, Roberto
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [5] Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - We need to report uncertain results and do it clearly
    Alderson, P
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7438): : 476 - 477
  • [6] STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE
    ALTMAN, DG
    BLAND, JM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) : 485 - 485
  • [7] Revision of Ethical Standard 3.04 of the "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (2002, as Amended 2010)
    American Psychological Association
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (09) : 900 - 900
  • [8] Retire statistical significance
    Amrhein, Valentin
    Greenland, Sander
    McShane, Blake
    [J]. NATURE, 2019, 567 (7748) : 305 - 307
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2022, About Us
  • [10] Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists
    Badenes-Ribera, Laura
    Frias-Navarro, Dolores
    Iotti, Bryan
    Bonilla-Campos, Amparo
    Longobardi, Claudio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7