Parameter estimation study of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell using artificial hummingbird algorithm

被引:10
作者
Celik, Muhammet [1 ]
Soylu, Selim [2 ]
机构
[1] Aksaray Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Aksaray, Turkey
[2] Aksaray Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Aksaray, Turkey
关键词
Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells; artificial hummingbird algorithm; parameter estimation; fuel cell; renewable energy; SEARCH ALGORITHM; SINGLE-PHASE; FLOW CHANNEL; 2-PHASE FLOW; MODEL; PEMFC; PERFORMANCE; WATER; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1177/09544062221133766
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This study represents a comprehensive investigation of the performance of Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm for parameter estimation for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell. With this purpose, four commercial fuel cell systems which were widely preferred in the literature such as NedStack PS6 (Case-I), 250 W fuel cell stack (Case-II), Horizon 500 W (Case-III), and BCS 500 W (Case-IV) were chosen. In order to compare the performance of this algorithm, seven well-known optimization techniques including Artificial Bee Colony, Salp Swarm Optimization, Particle Swarm Optimization, Gray Wolf Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Harris Hawks Optimization, and Whale Optimization Algorithm were used. The sum of the squared errors, computational speed, and statistical measurements were calculated for the performance comparison. In this context, the best SSE values were found as 2.06556, 5.25017, 0.02477, 0.01170 for Case-I, Case-II, Case-III, and Case-IV, respectively. The best standard deviation value was found as 1e(-6) for the Case-III. Based on the obtained results, the Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm established itself as a competitive optimization technique for parameter estimation study of PEMFC in terms of computational speed and robustness.
引用
收藏
页码:1956 / 1967
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Effective parameters' identification for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell models using grey wolf optimizer [J].
Ali, M. ;
El-Hameed, M. A. ;
Farahat, M. A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 111 :455-462
[2]   PERFORMANCE MODELING OF THE BALLARD-MARK-IV SOLD POLYMER ELECTROLYTE FUEL-CELL .2. EMPIRICAL-MODEL DEVELOPMENT [J].
AMPHLETT, JC ;
BAUMERT, RM ;
MANN, RF ;
PEPPLEY, BA ;
ROBERGE, PR ;
HARRIS, TJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 142 (01) :9-15
[3]   Parameter estimation of fuel cell polarization curve using BMO algorithm [J].
Askarzadeh, Alireza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (35) :15405-15413
[4]   Three-dimensional, single-phase, non-isothermal CFD model of a PEM fuel cell [J].
Baca, Carlos Martinez ;
Travis, Rowland ;
Bang, Mads .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2008, 178 (01) :269-281
[5]   A new method for optimal parameters identification of a PEMFC using an improved version of Monarch Butterfly Optimization Algorithm [J].
Bao, Songjian ;
Ebadi, Abdolghaffar ;
Toughani, Mohsen ;
Dalle, Juhriyansyah ;
Maseleno, Andino ;
Baharuddin ;
Yildizbasi, Abdullah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (35) :17882-17892
[6]   PEM fuel cell model parameters extraction based on moth-flame optimization [J].
Ben Messaoud, Ramzi ;
Midouni, Adnene ;
Hajji, Salah .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 229
[7]   Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell [J].
Berning, T ;
Lu, DM ;
Djilali, N .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2002, 106 (1-2) :284-294
[8]   PEM fuel cells model parameter identification based on a new improved fluid search optimization algorithm [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Kou, Xiaoxi ;
Wu, Yujia ;
Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak ;
Yildizbasi, Abdullah .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 :813-823
[9]   Cuckoo search algorithm with explosion operator for modeling proton exchange membrane fuel cells [J].
Chen, Yiping ;
Wang, Ning .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (05) :3075-3087
[10]   Semi-empirical PEM fuel cells model using whale optimization algorithm [J].
El-Fergany, Attia A. ;
Hasanien, Hany M. ;
Agwa, Ahmed M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 201