Precision co-composting of multi-source organic solid wastes provide a sustainable waste management strategy with high eco-efficiency: a life cycle assessment

被引:1
作者
Wang, Hongge [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Zelong [1 ]
Wang, Xuan [1 ]
Zhang, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaofei [1 ]
Li, Shuo [3 ]
Cao, Yubo [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Agr Water Resources, Hebei Key Lab Soil Ecol, Ctr Agr Resources Res,Inst Genet & Dev Biol, 286 Huaizhong Rd, Shijiazhuang 050021, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Anhui Prov Key Lab Farmland Ecol Conservat & Pollu, Key Lab JiangHuai Arable Land Resources Protect &, Hefei 230036, Peoples R China
关键词
Organic solid wastes; Co-composting; Environment cost; Economic benefits; Life cycle assessment (LCA); SANITARY-LANDFILL; NITROUS-OXIDE; EMISSIONS; CHALLENGES; MITIGATION; AMMONIA; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32320-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increase of organic solid wastes (OSWs), current waste management practices, such as landfill, incineration, and windrow composting, have shown weaknesses in both resource recycling and environmental protection. Co-composting has been used to achieve nutrient and carbon recycling but is accused of high ammonia emission and low degradation efficiency. Therefore, this study developed a precision co-composting strategy (S3, which adds functional bacteria generated from food processing waste to a co-composting system) and compared it with the current OSW treatment strategy (S1) and traditional co-composting strategy (S2) from a life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. The results showed that compared with S1, the eco-efficiency increased by 31.3% due to the higher economic profit of S2 but did not directly reduce the environmental cost. The addition of bacterial agents reduced ammonia emissions and shortened composting time, so compared with S1 and S2, the environmental cost of S3 was reduced by 37.9 and 43.6%, while the economic profit increased by 79.8 and 24.4%, respectively. The changes in environmental costs and economic benefits resulted in a huge improvement of S3's eco-efficiency, which was 189.6 and 121.7% higher than S1 and S2. Meanwhile, the adoption of S3 at a national scale in China could reduce the emission of 1,4-dichlorobenzene by 99.9% compared with S1 and increase profits by 6.58 billion USD per year. This study proposes a novel approach that exhibits high eco-efficiency in the treatment of OSWs.
引用
收藏
页码:17005 / 17017
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Mila i Canals, Llorenc
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6188) : 1109 - 1113
  • [12] Huang HePing Huang HePing, 2018, China Environmental Science, V38, P3844
  • [13] ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Steinmann, Zoran J. N.
    Elshout, Pieter M. F.
    Stam, Gea
    Verones, Francesca
    Vieira, Marisa
    Zijp, Michiel
    Hollander, Anne
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02) : 138 - 147
  • [14] Comparison of the organic waste management systems in the Danish-German border region using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Jensen, Morten Bang
    Moller, Jacob
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 49 : 491 - 504
  • [15] Environmental life cycle assessment of wheat production using chemical fertilizer, manure compost, and biochar-amended manure compost strategies
    Jiang, Zhixiang
    Zheng, Hao
    Xing, Baoshan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 760 (760)
  • [16] Anaerobic digestion: An alternative resource treatment option for food waste in China
    Jin, Chenxi
    Sun, Shiqiang
    Yang, Dianhai
    Sheng, Weijie
    Ma, Yadong
    He, Wenzhi
    Li, Guangming
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 779
  • [17] Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management options for India
    Khandelwal, Harshit
    Thalla, Arun Kumar
    Kumar, Sunil
    Kumar, Rakesh
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 288
  • [18] Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio
    Kumar, Mathava
    Ou, Yan-Liang
    Lin, Jih-Gaw
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (04) : 602 - 609
  • [19] Biogas production by means of an anaerobic-digestion plant in France: LCA of greenhouse-gas emissions and other environmental indicators
    Lamnatou, Chr.
    Nicolai, R.
    Chemisana, D.
    Cristofari, C.
    Cancellieri, D.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 670 : 1226 - 1239
  • [20] Economic and environmental sustainability of maize-wheat rotation production when substituting mineral fertilizers with manure in the North China Plain
    Li, Shuo
    Wu, Jiechen
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Ma, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271