Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Inverter-Dominated Power System Controls

被引:1
作者
Kwon, Kyung-Bin [1 ]
Mukherjee, Sayak [1 ]
Vu, Thanh Long [1 ]
Zhu, Hao [2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Optimizat & Control Grp, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Chandra Family Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS | 2023年 / 7卷
关键词
Frequency control; grid-forming inverter (GFM); inter-area oscillations; mean-variance risk constraint; reinforcement learning (RL);
D O I
10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3343948
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This letter develops a risk-aware controller for grid-forming inverters (GFMs) to minimize large frequency oscillations in GFM inverter-dominated power systems. To tackle the high variability from loads/renewables, we incorporate a mean-variance risk constraint into the classical linear quadratic regulator (LQR) formulation for this problem. The risk constraint aims to bound the time-averaged cost of state variability and thus can improve the worst-case performance for large disturbances. The resulting risk-constrained LQR problem is solved through the dual reformulation to a minimax problem, by using a reinforcement learning (RL) method termed as stochastic gradient-descent with max-oracle (SGDmax). In particular, the zero-order policy gradient (ZOPG) approach is used to simplify the gradient estimation using simulated system trajectories. Numerical tests conducted on the IEEE 68-bus system have validated the convergence of our proposed SGDmax for GFM model and corroborate the effectiveness of the risk constraint in improving the worst-case performance while reducing the variability of the overall control cost.
引用
收藏
页码:3854 / 3859
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Grid Forming Inverters: A Review of the State of the Art of Key Elements for Microgrid Operation
    Anttila, Sara
    Dohler, Jessica S.
    Oliveira, Janaina G.
    Bostrom, Cecilia
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)
  • [2] Du W., 2022, PROC IEEE POWER ENER, P1
  • [3] A Comparative Study of Two Widely Used Grid-Forming Droop Controls on Microgrid Small-Signal Stability
    Du, Wei
    Chen, Zhe
    Schneider, Kevin P.
    Lasseter, Robert H.
    Nandanoori, Sai Pushpak
    Tuffner, Francis K.
    Kundu, Soumya
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 8 (02) : 963 - 975
  • [4] An Improved Damping Method for Virtual Synchronous Machines
    Ebrahimi, Mohammad
    Khajehoddin, S. Ali
    Karimi-Ghartemani, Masoud
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 10 (03) : 1491 - 1500
  • [5] A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Intelligent Grid-Forming Inverter for Inertia Synthesis by Impedance Emulation
    Eskandari, Mohsen
    Savkin, Andrey V.
    Fletcher, John
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2023, 38 (03) : 2978 - 2981
  • [6] On the Exponential Number of Connected Components for the Feasible Set of Optimal Decentralized Control Problems
    Feng, Han
    Lavaei, Javad
    [J]. 2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 1430 - 1437
  • [7] The Effect of Transmission-Line Dynamics on Grid-Forming Dispatchable Virtual oscillator Control
    Gross, Dominic
    Colombino, Marcello
    Brouillon, Jean-Sebastien
    Dorfler, Florian
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2019, 6 (03): : 1148 - 1160
  • [8] Issa H., 2022, P IEEE PES INN SMART, P1
  • [9] Kundur P. P., 1994, Power System Stability and Control
  • [10] Model-free Learning for Risk-constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator with Structured Feedback in Networked Systems
    Kwon, Kyung-bin
    Ye, Lintao
    Gupta, Vijay
    Zhu, Hao
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 7260 - 7265