Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests

被引:2
|
作者
Trambadia, Dhwani N. [1 ]
Yadav, Payal [2 ]
Sargunaraj, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Med Hosp, Anesthesiol, Rajkot, India
[2] Chirayu Private Hosp, Anaesthesiol, Jaipur, India
[3] Sri Manakula Vinayagar Med Coll & Hosp, Anaesthesiol, Pondicherry, India
关键词
atlantooccipital; interincisor gap; lemon score; upper lip bite; mallampatti; difficult; predictors; LIP BITE TEST; THYROMENTAL DISTANCE; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPY; HEIGHT; RATIO; MALLAMPATI;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.46868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Predicting a difficult airway is one of the necessities in anesthesiology practice. Recognition of an obviously difficult airway leads to a series of communication and preparations to assist, as well as the establishment and maintenance of the airway. In this study, we compared various predictors of difficult laryngoscopy/intubation to determine the best possible difficult airway predictors. The present study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the following airway assessment tests to predict difficult airway: (1) Modified Mallamapati test; (2) thyromental distance; (3) inter-incisor gap; (4) upper lip bite test; (5) LEMON airway assessment test; and (6) atlantooccipital movement. Methodology A total of 300 patients who presented for different operative procedures were selected. Screening tests were done in the preoperative examination room. The tests included the Modified Mallamapati test, thyromental distance, upper lip bite test, inter-incisor gap, LEMON airway assessment, and atlantooccipital movement. Laryngoscopy was done in the operation theater and the view was classified according to Cormack-Lehane's scale. Using this clinical data, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of each test in predicting difficult airways were calculated. Results The thyromental distance test had the highest sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and PPV. LEMON airway assessment test had the lowest specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy. Thyromental distance had the highest accuracy followed by the Modified Mallampati test. Inter incisor gap had low sensitivity and PPV, and the atlantooccipital extension test had low sensitivity. Conclusions The currently available screening tests for difficult intubation have only poor-to-moderate discriminative power when used alone. No single airway test can provide a high index of sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of difficult airways. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and the thyromental distance test had the highest NPV. Every anesthesiologist must be trained and equipped to deal with now much less common, unexpected failure to intubate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and Validity of Preoperative Ultrasonographic Airway Assessment and Clinical Screening Tests to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy: A Prospective, Observational Study
    Harjai, Mamta
    Alam, Sharif
    Rastogi, Shivani
    Kumar, Sumit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [2] Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment
    Fulkerson, Justin S.
    Moore, Heather M.
    Anderson, Tristan S.
    Lowe, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2017, 31 (03) : 513 - 530
  • [3] Predicting the Difficult Airway: How Useful Are Preoperative Airway Tests?
    Tsai, Ya-Chu May
    Russotto, Vincenzo
    Parotto, Matteo
    CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 12 (03) : 398 - 406
  • [4] Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment
    Justin S. Fulkerson
    Heather M. Moore
    Tristan S. Anderson
    Robert F. Lowe
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017, 31 : 513 - 530
  • [5] Screening tests for predicting difficult intubation. A clinical assessment in turkish patients
    Bilgin, H
    Oyurt, G
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1998, 26 (04) : 382 - 386
  • [6] Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment
    Xia, Ming
    Ma, Wuhua
    Zuo, Mingzhang
    Deng, Xiaoming
    Xue, Fushan
    Battaglini, Denise
    Aggarwal, Vivek
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Cerny, Vladimir
    Di Giacinto, Ida
    Cataldo, Rita
    Ma, Daqing
    Yamamoto, Toru
    Rekatsina, Martina
    De Cassai, Alessandro
    Carsetti, Andrea
    Chang, Marvin G.
    Seet, Edwin
    Davis, Daniel P.
    Irwin, Michael G.
    Huang, Yuguang
    Jiang, Hong
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2023, 12 (04) : 545 - 566
  • [7] Anticipation of the difficult airway: preoperative airway assessment, an educational and quality improvement tool
    Cattano, D.
    Killoran, P. V.
    Iannucci, D.
    Maddukuri, V.
    Altamirano, A. V.
    Sridhar, S.
    Seitan, C.
    Chen, Z.
    Hagberg, C. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (02) : 276 - 285
  • [8] Predicting difficult airway intubation in thyroid surgery using multiple machine learning and deep learning algorithms
    Zhou, Cheng-Mao
    Wang, Ying
    Xue, Qiong
    Yang, Jian-Jun
    Zhu, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [9] Evaluation of different airway tests to determine difficult intubation in apparently normal adult patients: undergoing surgical procedures
    El-Radaideh, Khaled
    Dheeb, Ehab
    Shbool, Hamzeh
    Garaibeh, Saif
    Bataineh, Adel
    Khraise, Wail
    EL-Radaideh, Basil
    PATIENT SAFETY IN SURGERY, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [10] Predictive factors of difficult airway with known assessment scales
    Orozco-Diaz, Elida
    Jorge Alvarez-Rios, Juan
    Luis Arceo-Diaz, Jose
    Manuel Ornelas-Aguirre, Jose
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2010, 78 (05): : 393 - 399