Continuous theta-burst stimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study

被引:2
|
作者
Celebi, Lale Gundogdu
Sirin, Nermin Gorkem [1 ]
Elmali, Ayse Deniz
Baykan, Betul
Oge, Ali Emre
Bebek, Nerses
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Neurol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 2023年 / 53卷 / 03期
关键词
Epilepsy; Repetitive transcra-nial magnetic stimulation; Theta-burst stimulation; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; 30; HZ; ILAE COMMISSION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; MOTOR; FREQUENCY; CORTEX; TMS; SEIZURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102896
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods: Twelve patients with DRE (five with idiopathic generalized and seven with focal epilepsy) were included in this cross-over design study and randomized to either first sham or first active stimulation, each applied for 5 consecutive days. A round coil over the vertex was used in generalized epilepsy or a figure-of-8 coil over the "epileptogenic area" in focal epilepsy. Sham stimulation was given by placing the coil 90 degrees perpendicular to the head. The number of seizures, electroencephalography findings, Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-84), and Symptom Check List (SCL-90) scores evaluated during the 8-12 weeks before and after active and sham stimulations were compared statistically. Results: Eight patients could complete both active and sham stimulation periods of 5 days and two patients completed active stimulation sessions, without any significant adverse effects. The number of seizures significantly reduced after active cTBS, but not after sham stimulation, when compared with those recorded before the stimulation period. QOLIE scores were increased, but interictal epileptiform discharges and SCL-90 scores showed no difference after cTBS. Active stimulation was stopped in one patient after he experienced an aggravation of myoclonic seizures.Conclusions: cTBS seemed to be relatively safe and gave promising results in reducing the frequency of seizures in patients with both generalized and focal DRE. This time-saving technique may ease the introduction of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation into the routine practice of busy epilepsy clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Dual-Target Stimulation on Lower Limb Function in Patients with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Deng, Luoyi
    Song, Ning
    Wang, Jia
    Wang, Xianbin
    Chen, Van
    Wu, Shuang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : e46 - e59
  • [22] Continuous theta burst stimulation over the bilateral supplementary motor area in obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A clinical randomized single-blind sham-controlled trial
    Guo, Qihui
    Wang, Kaifeng
    Han, Huiqin
    Li, Puyu
    Cheng, Jiayue
    Zhu, Junjuan
    Wang, Zhen
    Fan, Qing
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 (01)
  • [23] THE EFFECT OF RADIAL EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE STIMULATION ON UPPER LIMB SPASTICITY IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS: A SINGLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    Dymarek, Robert
    Taradaj, Jakub
    Rosinczuk, Joanna
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 42 (08) : 1862 - 1875
  • [24] Treatment of major depressive disorder with bilateral theta burst stimulation: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial (TBS-D)
    Christian Plewnia
    Bettina Brendel
    Tobias Schwippel
    Vanessa Nieratschker
    Thomas Ethofer
    Thomas Kammer
    Frank Padberg
    Peter Martus
    Andreas J. Fallgatter
    European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2021, 271 : 1231 - 1243
  • [25] Effects of Pycnogenol on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study
    Enseleit, Frank
    Sudano, Isabella
    Periat, Daniel
    Winnik, Stephan
    Wolfrum, Mathias
    Flammer, Andreas J.
    Froehlich, Georg M.
    Kaiser, Priska
    Hirt, Astrid
    Haile, Sarah R.
    Krasniqi, Nazmi
    Matter, Christian M.
    Uhlenhut, Klaus
    Hoegger, Petra
    Neidhart, Michel
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Ruschitzka, Frank
    Noll, Georg
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (13) : 1589 - 1597
  • [26] Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy A single center longitudinal study of 143 patients
    Kahlow, Hannes
    Olivecrona, Magnus
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2013, 22 (10): : 827 - 833
  • [27] A comparative study of candesartan versus propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, double cross-over study
    Stovner, Lars J.
    Linde, Mattias
    Gravdahl, Goril B.
    Tronvik, Erling
    Aamodt, Anne H.
    Sand, Trond
    Hagen, Knut
    CEPHALALGIA, 2014, 34 (07) : 523 - 532
  • [28] The effect of levetiracetam on focal nocturnal epileptiform activity during sleep - A placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study
    Larsson, Pal Gunnar
    Bakke, Kristin A.
    Bjornaes, Helge
    Heminghyt, Einar
    Rytter, Elisif
    Brager-Larsen, Line
    Eriksson, Ann-Sofie
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2012, 24 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of adjunctive padsevonil in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: Results from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
    Rademacher, Michael
    Toledo, Manuel
    Van Paesschen, Wim
    Liow, Kore K.
    Milanov, Ivan G.
    Esch, Maria-Luise
    Wang, Nan
    MacPherson, Merran
    Byrnes, William J.
    Minh, Timothy D. C.
    Webster, Elizabeth
    Werhahn, Konrad J.
    EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2022, 7 (04) : 758 - 770
  • [30] Effect of adjunctive intermittent theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prophylactic treatment in migraine patients: A double-blind sham-controlled study
    Sahu, Amiya Krushna
    Sinha, Vinod Kumar
    Goyal, Nishant
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 61 (02) : 139 - 145