Differences in Learning Effectiveness Across Management Learning Environments: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Mueller, Fabian Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Wulf, Torsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Marburg, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Universitatsstr 24, D-35037 Marburg, Hessen, Germany
关键词
blended learning; case study; cognitive load theory; learning design; learning effectiveness; management education; working memory; FACE-TO-FACE; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PERCEIVED EASE; ONLINE; PERFORMANCE; SATISFACTION; COURSES; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/10525629231200206
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The extant literature indicates that blended learning leads to better outcomes compared to traditional lectures in management education. However, the working memory, which processes all incoming information, can be assumed to already work at capacity in traditional lectures. As blended environments cannot extend this capacity, they can only improve learning effectiveness if they can influence the mechanics underlying the working memory. Drawing on cognitive load theory from educational psychology, we posit that blended learning, by using technology as a differentiator, provides instructional designers with additional options and tools. When utilized effectively, these choices can reduce learners' cognitive load related to the design and increase cognitive load related to learning. Our assumptions are based on a case study with two different learning formats, including a blended environment that actively integrates technologies into the curriculum. Empirical evidence supports our hypotheses. We contribute to educational technology research in management education by explicitly considering the mechanics of the cognitive system and the effects of instructional design, curriculum choice, and related technology use. Our results suggest that blended environments can improve learning effectiveness if technologies are well integrated into curricula. Educational technologies, thus, provide entirely new opportunities for management educators but also require faculty development.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 828
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of Cognitive Load Theory in Mobile Micro-learning
    Meng, Jiaying
    Wang, Zhifan
    Li, Zhimin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE EDUCATION (MSIE), 2016, 60 : 295 - 298
  • [42] The comparison of two incidental learning scenarios on a digital learning platform from the cognitive load perspective
    Bayrambas, Fatma
    Sendurur, Emine
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (09) : 11087 - 11117
  • [43] The negative impact of media diversity on self-regulated learning strategies and cognitive load
    Lange, Christopher
    Costley, Jamie
    ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (01): : 158 - 179
  • [44] The Distorting Influence of Primacy Effects on Reporting Cognitive Load in Learning Materials of Varying Complexity
    Krieglstein, Felix
    Beege, Maik
    Wesenberg, Lukas
    Rey, Guenter Daniel
    Schneider, Sascha
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2025, 37 (01)
  • [45] Incidental Category Learning and Cognitive Load in a Multisensory Environment Across Childhood
    Broadbent, H. J.
    Osborne, T.
    Rea, M.
    Peng, A.
    Mareschal, D.
    Kirkham, N. Z.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 54 (06) : 1020 - 1028
  • [46] Effect of multitasking and task characteristics interaction on cognitive load and learning outcomes in virtual reality learning environments
    Tugtekin, Ufuk
    Odabasi, Hatice Ferhan
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (11) : 14915 - 14942
  • [47] Cognitive load theory and individual differences
    Sweller, John
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2024, 110
  • [48] New Learning Environments and Constructivism: The Students’ Perspective
    David Gijbels
    Gerard van de Watering
    Filip Dochy
    Piet van den Bossche
    Instructional Science, 2006, 34 : 213 - 226
  • [49] New learning environments and constructivism: The students' perspective
    Gijbels, David
    Van de Watering, Gerard
    Dochy, Filip
    Van den Bossche, Piet
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (03) : 213 - 226
  • [50] LEARNING MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE: INTEGRATING LEARNING CYCLE THEORY AND KNOWLEDGE TYPES PERSPECTIVE
    Lee, Kuo-Wei
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2020, 19 (02) : 192 - 222