Improving global hydrological simulations through bias-correction and multi-model blending

被引:9
|
作者
Chevuturi, Amulya [1 ]
Tanguy, Maliko [1 ]
Facer-Childs, Katie [1 ]
Martinez-de la Torre, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Sunita [1 ]
Thober, Stephan [3 ]
Samaniego, Luis [3 ,4 ]
Rakovec, Oldrich [3 ,5 ]
Kelbling, Matthias [3 ]
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H. [6 ]
Wanders, Niko [6 ]
Blyth, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England
[2] Agencia Estatal Meteorol AEMET, Meteorol Surveillance & Forecasting Grp, DT Galicia, La Coruna, Spain
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Hydrosyst, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Praha Suchdol 16500, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Global hydrological forecasts; Hydrological models; ULYSSES; HydroSOS; Bias-correction; Multi-model blending; SOIL-MOISTURE; ENSEMBLE PREDICTION; MODEL DESCRIPTION; LAND EVAPORATION; PRECIPITATION; UNCERTAINTY; STREAMFLOW; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129607
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There is an immediate need to develop accurate and reliable global hydrological forecasts in light of the future vulnerability to hydrological hazards and water scarcity under a changing climate. As a part of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Hydrological Status and Outlook System (HydroSOS) initiative, we investigated different approaches to blending multi-model simulations for developing holistic operational global forecasts. The ULYSSES (mULti-model hYdrological SeaSonal prEdictionS system) dataset, to be published as "Global seasonal forecasts and reforecasts of river discharge and related hydrological variables ensemble from four state-of-the-art land surface and hydrological models"is used in this study. The first step for improving these forecasts is to investigate ways to improve the model simulations, as global models are not calibrated for local conditions. The analysis was performed over 119 different catchments worldwide for the baseline period of 1981-2019 for three variables: evapotranspiration, surface soil moisture and streamflow. This study evaluated blending approaches with a performance metric based (weighted) averaging of the multi-model simulations, using the catchment's Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) for the variable to define the weight. Hydrological model simulations were also bias-corrected to improve the multi-model blending output. Weighted blending in conjunction with bias-correction provided the best improvement in performance for the catchments investigated. Applying modelled weights during blending original simulations improved performance over ungauged catchments. The results indicate that there is potential to successfully and easily implement the bias-corrected weighted blending approach to improve operational forecasts globally. This work can be used to improve water resources management and hydrological hazard mitigation, especially in data-sparse regions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Statistical downscaling of general circulation model outputs to precipitation - part 2: bias-correction and future projections
    Sachindra, D. A.
    Huang, F.
    Barton, A.
    Perera, B. J. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (11) : 3282 - 3303
  • [42] MULTI-MODEL ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ON HYDROLOGICAL REGIME IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Hanel, Martin
    Vizina, Adam
    UCLIO 2010: UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE IN LIFE SCIENCES - PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 210 - 215
  • [43] Multi-model hydrological reference dataset over continental Europe and an African basin
    Droppers, Bram
    Rakovec, Oldrich
    Avila, Leandro
    Azimi, Shima
    Cortes-Torres, Nicolas
    Perez, David De Leon
    Imhoff, Ruben
    Frances, Felix
    Kollet, Stefan
    Rigon, Riccardo
    Weerts, Albrecht
    Samaniego, Luis
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [44] Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models
    Piani, C.
    Weedon, G. P.
    Best, M.
    Gomes, S. M.
    Viterbo, P.
    Hagemann, S.
    Haerter, J. O.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 395 (3-4) : 199 - 215
  • [45] Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: bias assumptions and interannual variability
    Buser, Christoph M.
    Kuensch, H. R.
    Luethi, D.
    Wild, M.
    Schaer, C.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2009, 33 (06) : 849 - 868
  • [46] TIN-Copula bias-correction method for model-derived maximum temperature in the MENA region
    Lazoglou, Georgia
    Zittis, George
    Hadjinicolaou, Panos
    Lelieveld, Jos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (04) : 2260 - 2280
  • [47] Impact of bias correction to reanalysis products on simulations of North American soil moisture and hydrological fluxes
    Berg, AA
    Famiglietti, JS
    Walker, JP
    Houser, PR
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
  • [48] Climate projections and extremes in dynamically downscaled CMIP5 model outputs over the Bengal delta: a quartile based bias-correction approach with new gridded data
    Hasan, M. Alfi
    Islam, A. K. M. Saiful
    Akanda, Ali Shafqat
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 51 (5-6) : 2169 - 2190
  • [49] Demonstrating the bias-correction impact on regional climate model (RegCM) over the Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Implication for temperature and precipitation
    Jo, Kum-Ryong
    Pak, Ki-Song
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2022, 131 (02)
  • [50] Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?
    Ehret, U.
    Zehe, E.
    Wulfmeyer, V.
    Warrach-Sagi, K.
    Liebert, J.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (09) : 3391 - 3404