Improving global hydrological simulations through bias-correction and multi-model blending

被引:9
|
作者
Chevuturi, Amulya [1 ]
Tanguy, Maliko [1 ]
Facer-Childs, Katie [1 ]
Martinez-de la Torre, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Sunita [1 ]
Thober, Stephan [3 ]
Samaniego, Luis [3 ,4 ]
Rakovec, Oldrich [3 ,5 ]
Kelbling, Matthias [3 ]
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H. [6 ]
Wanders, Niko [6 ]
Blyth, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England
[2] Agencia Estatal Meteorol AEMET, Meteorol Surveillance & Forecasting Grp, DT Galicia, La Coruna, Spain
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Hydrosyst, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Praha Suchdol 16500, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Global hydrological forecasts; Hydrological models; ULYSSES; HydroSOS; Bias-correction; Multi-model blending; SOIL-MOISTURE; ENSEMBLE PREDICTION; MODEL DESCRIPTION; LAND EVAPORATION; PRECIPITATION; UNCERTAINTY; STREAMFLOW; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129607
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There is an immediate need to develop accurate and reliable global hydrological forecasts in light of the future vulnerability to hydrological hazards and water scarcity under a changing climate. As a part of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Hydrological Status and Outlook System (HydroSOS) initiative, we investigated different approaches to blending multi-model simulations for developing holistic operational global forecasts. The ULYSSES (mULti-model hYdrological SeaSonal prEdictionS system) dataset, to be published as "Global seasonal forecasts and reforecasts of river discharge and related hydrological variables ensemble from four state-of-the-art land surface and hydrological models"is used in this study. The first step for improving these forecasts is to investigate ways to improve the model simulations, as global models are not calibrated for local conditions. The analysis was performed over 119 different catchments worldwide for the baseline period of 1981-2019 for three variables: evapotranspiration, surface soil moisture and streamflow. This study evaluated blending approaches with a performance metric based (weighted) averaging of the multi-model simulations, using the catchment's Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) for the variable to define the weight. Hydrological model simulations were also bias-corrected to improve the multi-model blending output. Weighted blending in conjunction with bias-correction provided the best improvement in performance for the catchments investigated. Applying modelled weights during blending original simulations improved performance over ungauged catchments. The results indicate that there is potential to successfully and easily implement the bias-corrected weighted blending approach to improve operational forecasts globally. This work can be used to improve water resources management and hydrological hazard mitigation, especially in data-sparse regions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions?
    Teutschbein, C.
    Seibert, J.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (12) : 5061 - 5077
  • [32] Impacts of hydrological model calibration on projected hydrological changes under climate change-a multi-model assessment in three large river basins
    Huang, Shaochun
    Shah, Harsh
    Naz, Bibi S.
    Shrestha, Narayan
    Mishra, Vimal
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Ghimire, Uttam
    Vetter, Tobias
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1143 - 1164
  • [33] Bias-correction of Kalman filter estimators associated to a linear state space model with estimated parameters
    Costa, Marco
    Monteiro, Magda
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2016, 176 : 22 - 32
  • [34] A pragmatic approach for the downscaling and bias correction of regional climate simulations: evaluation in hydrological modeling
    Marke, T.
    Mauser, W.
    Pfeiffer, A.
    Zaengl, G.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 4 (03) : 759 - 770
  • [35] Bias correcting discharge simulations from the GEOGloWS global hydrologic model
    Hales, Riley C.
    Williams, Gustavious P.
    Nelson, E. James
    Sowby, Robert B.
    Ames, Daniel P.
    Lozano, Jorge Luis Sanchez
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 626
  • [36] Explanation and Optimizing Multi-Model Blending Algorithm Using Random Variables Theory
    Wang, Yu
    Cao, Yong
    Shen, Yue
    Zhao, Ruixia
    Zeng, Xiaoqing
    Yao, Li
    Dai, Kan
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 52 (04)
  • [37] Improving Multi-Model Ensemble Forecasts of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Using Bayesian Model Averaging
    Song, Xiaojiang
    Zhu, Yuejian
    Peng, Jiayi
    Guan, Hong
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32 (05) : 794 - 803
  • [38] Improving performance of bucket-type hydrological models in high latitudes with multi-model combination methods: Can we wring water from a stone?
    Todorovic, A.
    Grabs, T.
    Teutschbein, C.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 632
  • [39] The impact of a bias-correction approach (delta change) applied directly to hydrological model output when modelling the severity of ice jam flooding under future climate scenarios
    Das, Apurba
    RokayanAff, Prabin
    Lindenschmidt, Karl-Erich
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2022, 172 (1-2)
  • [40] A MULTI-MODEL ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ON HYDROLOGICAL REGIME IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Hanel, Martin
    Vizina, Adam
    Maca, Petr
    Pavlasek, Jiri
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS, 2012, 60 (03) : 152 - 161