Improving global hydrological simulations through bias-correction and multi-model blending

被引:9
|
作者
Chevuturi, Amulya [1 ]
Tanguy, Maliko [1 ]
Facer-Childs, Katie [1 ]
Martinez-de la Torre, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Sunita [1 ]
Thober, Stephan [3 ]
Samaniego, Luis [3 ,4 ]
Rakovec, Oldrich [3 ,5 ]
Kelbling, Matthias [3 ]
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H. [6 ]
Wanders, Niko [6 ]
Blyth, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England
[2] Agencia Estatal Meteorol AEMET, Meteorol Surveillance & Forecasting Grp, DT Galicia, La Coruna, Spain
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Hydrosyst, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Praha Suchdol 16500, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Global hydrological forecasts; Hydrological models; ULYSSES; HydroSOS; Bias-correction; Multi-model blending; SOIL-MOISTURE; ENSEMBLE PREDICTION; MODEL DESCRIPTION; LAND EVAPORATION; PRECIPITATION; UNCERTAINTY; STREAMFLOW; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129607
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There is an immediate need to develop accurate and reliable global hydrological forecasts in light of the future vulnerability to hydrological hazards and water scarcity under a changing climate. As a part of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Hydrological Status and Outlook System (HydroSOS) initiative, we investigated different approaches to blending multi-model simulations for developing holistic operational global forecasts. The ULYSSES (mULti-model hYdrological SeaSonal prEdictionS system) dataset, to be published as "Global seasonal forecasts and reforecasts of river discharge and related hydrological variables ensemble from four state-of-the-art land surface and hydrological models"is used in this study. The first step for improving these forecasts is to investigate ways to improve the model simulations, as global models are not calibrated for local conditions. The analysis was performed over 119 different catchments worldwide for the baseline period of 1981-2019 for three variables: evapotranspiration, surface soil moisture and streamflow. This study evaluated blending approaches with a performance metric based (weighted) averaging of the multi-model simulations, using the catchment's Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) for the variable to define the weight. Hydrological model simulations were also bias-corrected to improve the multi-model blending output. Weighted blending in conjunction with bias-correction provided the best improvement in performance for the catchments investigated. Applying modelled weights during blending original simulations improved performance over ungauged catchments. The results indicate that there is potential to successfully and easily implement the bias-corrected weighted blending approach to improve operational forecasts globally. This work can be used to improve water resources management and hydrological hazard mitigation, especially in data-sparse regions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bias-correction schemes for calibrated flow in a conceptual hydrological model
    Bum Kim, Kue
    Kwon, Hyun-Han
    Han, Dawei
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 52 (01): : 196 - 211
  • [2] Hydrological Modeling to Evaluate Climate Model Simulations and Their Bias Correction
    Hakala, Kirsti
    Addor, Nans
    Seibert, Jan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 19 (08) : 1321 - 1337
  • [3] Distribution-based pooling for combination and multi-model bias correction of climate simulations
    Vrac, Mathieu
    Allard, Denis
    Mariethoz, Gregoire
    Thao, Soulivanh
    Schmutz, Lucas
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2024, 15 (03) : 735 - 762
  • [4] Assessing Fourier and Latin hypercube sampling methods as new multi-model methods for hydrological simulations
    Singh, Ankit
    Mondal, Soubhik
    Pandey, Ripunjay
    Jha, Sanjeev Kumar
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 38 (04) : 1271 - 1295
  • [5] The roles of bias-correction and resolution in regional climate simulations of summer extremes
    PaiMazumder, Debasish
    Done, James M.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (5-6) : 1565 - 1581
  • [6] Impacts of bias nonstationarity of climate model outputs on hydrological simulations
    Hui, Yu
    Xu, Yuni
    Chen, Jie
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Chen, Hua
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (05): : 925 - 941
  • [7] The roles of bias-correction and resolution in regional climate simulations of summer extremes
    Debasish PaiMazumder
    James M. Done
    Climate Dynamics, 2015, 45 : 1565 - 1581
  • [8] Hydrological ensemble forecasting using a multi-model framework
    Dion, Patrice
    Martel, Jean-Luc
    Arsenault, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 600 (600)
  • [9] Exploring the value of machine learning for weighted multi-model combination of an ensemble of global hydrological models
    Zaherpour, Jamal
    Mount, Nick
    Gosling, Simon N.
    Dankers, Rutger
    Eisner, Stephanie
    Gerten, Dieter
    Liu, Xingcai
    Masaki, Yoshimitsu
    Schmied, Hannes Mueller
    Tang, Qiuhong
    Wada, Yoshihide
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 114 : 112 - 128
  • [10] Evaluation and application of Bayesian multi-model estimation in temperature simulations
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Duan, Qingyun
    Sun, Qiaohong
    Li, Jianduo
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 37 (06): : 727 - 744