Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods for risk estimation of delirium in patients hospitalized from the emergency department

被引:8
|
作者
Mueller, Brianna [1 ]
Street, W. Nick [1 ]
Carnahan, Ryan M. M. [2 ]
Lee, Sangil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Epidemiol, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Emergency Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
delirium; emergency department; risk estimation; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM; OLDER-ADULTS; VALIDATION; SCALE; RELIABILITY; PREDICTION; MORTALITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/acps.13551
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: Delirium is a cerebral dysfunction seen commonly in the acute care setting. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity and is frequently missed in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient care by clinical gestalt alone. Identifying those at risk of delirium may help prioritize screening and interventions in the hospital setting. Objective: Our objective was to leverage electronic health records to identify a clinically valuable risk estimation model for prevalent delirium in patients being transferred from the ED to inpatient units. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study to develop and validate a risk model to detect delirium using patient data available from prior visits and ED encounter. Electronic health records were extracted for patients hospitalized from the ED between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Eligible patients were aged 65 or older, admitted to an inpatient unit from the emergency department, and had at least one DOSS assessment or CAM-ICU recorded within 72 h of hospitalization. Six machine learning models were developed to estimate the risk of delirium using clinical variables including demographic features, physiological measurements, medications administered, lab results, and diagnoses. Results: A total of 28,531 patients met the inclusion criteria with 8057 (28.4%) having a positive delirium screening within the outcome observation period. Machine learning models were compared using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). The gradient boosted machine achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI, 0.837-0.841). At a 90% sensitivity threshold, this model achieved a specificity of 53.5% (95% CI 53.0%-54.0%) a positive predictive value of 43.5% (95% CI 43.2%-43.9%), and a negative predictive value of 93.1% (95% CI 93.1%-93.2%). A random forest model and L1-penalized logistic regression also demonstrated notable performance with AUCs of 0.837 (95% CI, 0.835-0.838) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.830-0.833) respectively.protocols. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the use of machine learning algorithms to identify a combination of variables that enables an estimation of risk of positive delirium screens early in hospitalization to develop prevention or management protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 505
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict High-Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients
    Liu, Yuan
    Shen, Wei
    Tian, Zhiqiang
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2023, 18 : 157 - 168
  • [42] Patients with acute heart failure discharged from the emergency department and classified as low risk by the MEESSI score (multiple risk estimate based on the Spanish emergency department scale): prevalence of adverse events and predictability
    Miro, Oscar
    Gil, Victor
    Rossello, Xavier
    Javier Martin-Sanchez, Francisco
    Llorens, Pere
    Jacob, Javier
    Herrero, Pablo
    Herrera Mateo, Sergio
    Richard, Fernando
    Escoda, Rosa
    Fuentes, Marta
    Martin Mojarro, Enrique
    Llauger, Lluis
    Bueno, Hector
    Pocock, Stuart
    Gil, Cristina
    Garmila, Pablo
    Rodriguez Adrada, Esther
    Perdigones, Javier
    Escobar, Luis
    Xipell, Carolina
    Sanchez, Carolina
    Ma Gaytan, Josep
    Jose Perez-Dura, Maria
    Pavon, Jose
    Bella Alvarez, Ana
    Noval, Antonio
    Torres, Jose M.
    Luisa Lopez-Grima, Maria
    Valero, Amparo
    Angeles Juan, Marian
    Aguirre, Alfons
    Angels Pedragosa, Maria
    Isabel Alonso, Maria
    Ruiz, Francisco
    Miguel Franco, Jose
    Diaz, Elena
    Belen Mecina, Ana
    Tost, Josep
    Sanchez, Susana
    Pinera, Pascual
    Torres Garate, Raquel
    Alberto Rizzi, Miguel
    Herrera, Sergio
    Cabello, Irene
    Alvarez Perez, Jose Maria
    Lopez Diez, Maria Pilar
    Vasquez Alvarez, Joaquin
    Alonso Morilla, Ana
    Irimia, Andrea
    EMERGENCIAS, 2019, 31 (01): : 5 - 14
  • [43] An application for forecasting the number of applications to the emergency department with time series analysis and machine learning methods
    Ciftci, Sema
    Batur Sir, Gul Didem
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 29 (07): : 667 - 679
  • [44] Developing and evaluating an automated appendicitis risk stratification algorithm for pediatric patients in the emergency department
    Deleger, Louise
    Brodzinski, Holly
    Zhai, Haijun
    Li, Qi
    Lingren, Todd
    Kirkendall, Eric S.
    Alessandrini, Evaline
    Solti, Imre
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (E2) : E212 - E220
  • [45] Risk of injury from alcohol, marijuana and emergency department patients
    Cherpitel, Cheryl J.
    Ye, Yu
    Andreuccetti, Gabriel
    Stockwell, Tim
    Vallance, Kate
    Chow, Clifton
    Brubacher, Jeffrey R.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2017, 174 : 121 - 127
  • [46] Performance of machine learning models in identifying and predicting patients' need for intensive care in emergency department triage: A systematic review
    Chen, Yujing
    Chen, Han
    Sun, Qian
    Zhai, Rui
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Zhou, Jianyi
    Li, Shufang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 73 : 166 - 170
  • [47] Screening and detection of delirium in older ED patients: performance of the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department (mCAM-ED). A two-step tool
    Hasemann, Wolfgang
    Grossmann, Florian F.
    Stadler, Rahel
    Bingisser, Roland
    Breil, Dieter
    Hafner, Martina
    Kressig, Reto W.
    Nickel, Christian H.
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (06) : 915 - 922
  • [48] Delirium detection in hospitalized adults: the performance of the 4 'A's Test and the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department. A comparison study
    Olga Muser
    Kevin Seiler
    Stefanie Bachnick
    Beatrice Gehri
    Franziska Zúñiga
    Wolfgang Hasemann
    Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 46 (1)
  • [49] Novel Machine Learning Approach to Predict and Personalize Length of Stay for Patients Admitted with Syncope from the Emergency Department
    Lee, Sangil
    Reddy Mudireddy, Avinash
    Kumar Pasupula, Deepak
    Adhaduk, Mehul
    Barsotti, E. John
    Sonka, Milan
    Statz, Giselle M.
    Bullis, Tyler
    Johnston, Samuel L.
    Evans, Aron Z.
    Olshansky, Brian
    Gebska, Milena A.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [50] Evaluating the Stroke Risk of Patients using Machine Learning: A New Perspective from Sichuan and Chongqing
    Zheng, Jin
    Xiong, Yao
    Zheng, Yimei
    Zhang, Haitao
    Wu, Rui
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 2024, 48 (02) : 346 - 369