Public preferences for social investment versus compensation policies in Social Europe

被引:3
作者
Eick, Gianna M. [1 ,3 ]
Burgoon, Brian [1 ]
Busemeyer, Marius R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, NL-1001 NB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
social Europe; welfare state; social investment; public opinion; socioeconomic groups; INTEGRATION; SUPPORT; EU; CITIZENSHIP; BOUNDARIES; ATTITUDES; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1177/09589287231212784
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The recent enactment of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) has significantly strengthened the social dimension of the European Union (EU), including the social investment (SI) elements of that social dimension. What is not known, however, to what extent the priorization of SI is supported by the broader public. To address this research gap, we investigate public opinion on 15 different policy areas from the EPSR using Eurobarometer data from 2020 across all EU countries, asking whether the public rather prefers these policies to be delivered at EU or national level. A principal finding is that the public indeed supports more SI than CP policies with respect to EU-level social policy, and more CP than SI policies with respect to national-level social policy. We also investigate whether socioeconomic status (SES) and welfare state effort can explain this phenomenon. We find that higher socio-economic status and more generous welfare states are associated with more support for SI policies on both EU and national levels and vice versa. The findings emphasize the importance of what policies are provided versus who provides them but also pose a puzzle for trade-offs in multilevel governance settings. Hence, the article has important implications for future research on public opinion and Social Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 569
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Public attitudes towards a European minimum income benefit: How (perceived) welfare state performance and expectations shape popular support [J].
Baute, Sharon ;
Meuleman, Bart .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2020, 30 (04) :404-420
[2]   Measuring Attitudes Towards Social Europe: A Multidimensional Approach [J].
Baute, Sharon ;
Meuleman, Bart ;
Abts, Koen ;
Swyngedouw, Marc .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2018, 137 (01) :353-378
[3]  
Bonoli G., 2013, The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Polices in a Comparative Perspective, V1st
[4]   A federalist's dilemma: Trade-offs between social legitimacy and budget responsibility in multi-tiered welfare states [J].
Bonoli, Giuliano ;
Natili, Marcello ;
Trein, Philipp .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2019, 29 (01) :56-69
[5]   Public opinion on welfare state recalibration in times of austerity: evidence from survey experiments [J].
Bremer, Bjorn ;
Burgisser, Reto .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2023, 11 (01) :34-52
[6]   Why do welfare states persist? [J].
Brooks, Clem ;
Manza, Jeff .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2006, 68 (04) :816-827
[7]   Unemployment risk-sharing in the EU: How policy design influences citizen support for European unemployment policy [J].
Burgoon, Brian ;
Kuhn, Theresa ;
Nicoli, Francesco ;
Vandenbroucke, Frank .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2022, 23 (02) :282-308
[8]   Social Nation and Social Europe Support for National and Supranational Welfare Compensation in Europe [J].
Burgoon, Brian .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2009, 10 (04) :427-455
[9]   Beyond Positive and Negative: New Perspectives on Feedback Effects in Public Opinion on the Welfare State [J].
Busemeyer, Marius R. ;
Abrassart, Aurelien ;
Nezi, Roula .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (01) :137-162
[10]   Inequality and the political economy of education: An analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries [J].
Busemeyer, Marius R. .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 22 (03) :219-240