Automated classification of multiple ophthalmic diseases using ultrasound images by deep learning

被引:1
作者
Wang, Yijie [1 ]
Xu, Zihao [2 ]
Dan, Ruilong [2 ]
Yao, Chunlei [1 ]
Shao, Ji [1 ]
Sun, Yiming [1 ]
Wang, Yaqi [3 ,5 ]
Ye, Juan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Microelect CAD Ctr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Zhejiang, Coll Media Engn Commun, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Zhejiang, Coll Media Engn Commun, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
diagnostic tests/investigation; imaging; VALIDATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1136/bjo-2022-322953
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background Ultrasound imaging is suitable for detecting and diagnosing ophthalmic abnormalities. However, a shortage of experienced sonographers and ophthalmologists remains a problem. This study aims to develop a multibranch transformer network (MBT-Net) for the automated classification of multiple ophthalmic diseases using B-mode ultrasound images.Methods Ultrasound images with six clinically confirmed categories, including normal, retinal detachment, vitreous haemorrhage, intraocular tumour, posterior scleral staphyloma and other abnormalities, were used to develop and evaluate the MBT-Net. Images were derived from five different ultrasonic devices operated by different sonographers and divided into training set, validation set, internal testing set and temporal external testing set. Two senior ophthalmologists and two junior ophthalmologists were recruited to compare the model's performance.Results A total of 10 184 ultrasound images were collected. The MBT-Net got an accuracy of 87.80% (95% CI 86.26% to 89.18%) in the internal testing set, which was significantly higher than junior ophthalmologists (95% CI 67.37% to 79.16%; both p<0.05) and lower than senior ophthalmologists (95% CI 89.45% to 92.61%; both p<0.05). The micro-average area under the curve of the six-category classification was 0.98. With reference to comprehensive clinical diagnosis, the measurements of agreement were almost perfect in the MBT-Net (kappa=0.85, p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of the MBT-Net across five ultrasonic devices (p=0.27). The MBT-Net got an accuracy of 82.21% (95% CI 78.45% to 85.44%) in the temporal external testing set.Conclusions The MBT-Net showed high accuracy for screening and diagnosing multiple ophthalmic diseases using only ultrasound images across mutioperators and mutidevices.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1004
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Development and validation of an offline deep learning algorithm to detect vitreoretinal abnormalities on ocular ultrasound
    Adithya, Venkatesh Krishna
    Baskaran, Prabu
    Aruna, S.
    Mohankumar, Arthi
    Hubschman, Jean Pierre
    Shukla, Aakriti Garg
    Venkatesh, Rengaraj
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (04) : 1145 - 1149
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence in Thyroid Field-A Comprehensive Review
    Bini, Fabiano
    Pica, Andrada
    Azzimonti, Laura
    Giusti, Alessandro
    Ruinelli, Lorenzo
    Marinozzi, Franco
    Trimboli, Pierpaolo
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [3] A Deep Learning Model for Screening Multiple Abnormal Findings in Ophthalmic Ultrasonography (With Video)
    Chen, Di
    Yu, Yi
    Zhou, Yiwen
    Peng, Bin
    Wang, Yujing
    Hu, Shan
    Tian, Miao
    Wan, Shanshan
    Gao, Yuelan
    Wang, Ying
    Yan, Yulin
    Wu, Lianlian
    Yao, LiWen
    Zheng, Biqing
    Wang, Yang
    Huang, Yuqing
    Chen, Xi
    Yu, Honggang
    Yang, Yanning
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (04):
  • [4] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [5] Ocular ultrasonography focused on the posterior eye segment: what radiologists should know
    De La Hoz Polo M.
    Torramilans Lluís A.
    Pozuelo Segura O.
    Anguera Bosque A.
    Esmerado Appiani C.
    Caminal Mitjana J.M.
    [J]. Insights into Imaging, 2016, 7 (3) : 351 - 364
  • [6] Diederik P. K., 2015, INT C LEARNING REPR
  • [7] The Utility of Deep Learning in Breast Ultrasonic Imaging: A Review
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kubota, Kazunori
    Oyama, Jun
    Yamaga, Emi
    Yashima, Yuka
    Katsuta, Leona
    Nomura, Kyoko
    Nara, Miyako
    Oda, Goshi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Kitazume, Yoshio
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (12)
  • [8] Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
    Gulshan, Varun
    Peng, Lily
    Coram, Marc
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    Wu, Derek
    Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam
    Venugopalan, Subhashini
    Widner, Kasumi
    Madams, Tom
    Cuadros, Jorge
    Kim, Ramasamy
    Raman, Rajiv
    Nelson, Philip C.
    Mega, Jessica L.
    Webster, R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2402 - 2410
  • [9] A Survey on Vision Transformer
    Han, Kai
    Wang, Yunhe
    Chen, Hanting
    Chen, Xinghao
    Guo, Jianyuan
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Tang, Yehui
    Xiao, An
    Xu, Chunjing
    Xu, Yixing
    Yang, Zhaohui
    Zhang, Yiman
    Tao, Dacheng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 45 (01) : 87 - 110
  • [10] Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
    He, Kaiming
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Ren, Shaoqing
    Sun, Jian
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 770 - 778