SCIP flap in head and neck reconstruction after oncologic ablative surgery: a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Rosti, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Ammar, Alessandro [3 ]
Pignatti, Marco [2 ,3 ]
Molteni, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Franchi, Alberto [4 ]
Cipriani, Riccardo [3 ]
Presutti, Livio [1 ,2 ]
Fermi, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Policlin St Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
[2] Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
[3] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Plast Surg, Policlin St Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
[4] Cantonal Hosp Winterthur, Dept Hand & Plast Surg, Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Head and neck; Free flap; Microvascular flap; Reconstructive surgery; Postoncological reconstruction; ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP; GROIN; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-08287-0
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background In the surgical treatment of head and neck locally advanced malignancies, microvascular free flaps represent the most valuable solution to reconstruct the tissue defect after resection of the primary neoplasm. In particular, microvascular free flaps allow to restore the functional and aesthetical features of the head and neck compartments. The superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) flap represents, as an evolution of the groin flap, a valid alternative to the radial fasciocutaneous free (RFFF) flap or the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap.Methods This systematic review adhered to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2009 guidelines. A computerized MEDLINE search was performed using the PubMed service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (www.pubmed.org) and Scopus database (www.scopus.com). Two authors screened the articles, then selected and extracted data on malignancies characteristics, reconstructive techniques, outcomes, and complications.Results A total of 25 articles were selected and reviewed among the 39 identified through the search string. Six out of the selected 25 articles were case reports, while the remaining 19 articles were retrospective case series. The whole study population was represented by 174 oncologic patients undergoing ablation of a head and neck tumor and reconstruction with a SCIP flap. The site of reconstruction was the oral cavity in 125 (71.0%) patients, being the tongue the most common subsite in 73 (41.5%) patients, the pharynx in 10 (5.7%) cases, the larynx in 3 (1.7%) and head and neck skin in 36 (20.4%) patients. Only two cases of total flap loss were reported. Partial flap loss or shrinkage requiring minor surgical revisions was observed in 11 patients (6.32%). Primary closure of the donor site was achieved in the whole study population, according to the available data.Conclusions In head and neck postoncological reconstruction, despite the caliber and the length of the pedicle, SCIP flap offers a pliable and thin skin paddle, allowing single-stage resurfacing, medium to large skin paddle, possibility of composite-fashion harvest and a well-concealed donor site.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1093
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supraclavicular Artery Flap for Head and Neck Oncologic Reconstruction: An Emerging Alternative
    Shenoy, Ashok
    Patil, Vijayraj S.
    Prithvi, B. S.
    Chavan, P.
    Halkud, Rajshekar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [22] The team concept in mandibular reconstruction after ablative oncologic surgery
    Lydiatt, DD
    Hollins, RR
    Friedman, A
    Lydiatt, CA
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (06) : 607 - 610
  • [23] Systematic review of submental artery island flap versus free flap in head and neck reconstruction
    Mooney, Sean M.
    Sukato, Daniel C.
    Azoulay, Ofer
    Rosenfeld, Richard M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06)
  • [24] Systematic Review of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap vs Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Sukato, Daniel C.
    Timashpolsky, Alisa
    Ferzli, George
    Rosenfeld, Richard M.
    Gordin, Eli A.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 160 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [25] Systematic review of the free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction
    Razmi, Samuel E.
    Entezami, Payam
    Asarkar, Ameya A.
    Ware, Erin
    Hayden, Richard E.
    Chang, Brent A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 45 (02)
  • [26] Systematic Review of the Profunda Artery Perforator Free Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Wilson, Renita
    Cave, Taylor
    Entezami, Payam
    Ware, Erin
    Chang, Brent A.
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [27] Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction after Oncologic Surgery: Expected Outcomes in the Elderly
    Grammatica, Alberto
    Piazza, Cesare
    Paderno, Alberto
    Taglietti, Valentina
    Marengoni, Alessandra
    Nicolai, Piero
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 152 (05) : 796 - 802
  • [28] Complications of double free flap and free flap combined with locoregional flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review
    Chen, Collin L.
    Zenga, Joseph
    Roland, Lauren T.
    Pipkorn, Patrik
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (03): : 632 - 646
  • [29] Reconstruction after ablative treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck
    Chung, Ho Yun
    Teresa, M. O. M.
    Tombris, Stavros
    Meyer, Lutz
    Waner, Milton
    JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2022, 51 (10) : 872 - 877
  • [30] THE FAMILY OF FLAPS AND THE FLAP OVER IMPLANTS - ADVANCES IN ORAL CAVITY RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING HEAD AND NECK ONCOLOGIC SURGERY
    JACOBS, JR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (04): : 1261 - 1262