A Comparison of the Project Management Methodologies PRINCE2 and PMBOK in Managing Repetitive Construction Projects

被引:3
作者
Simonaitis, Aivaras [1 ]
Dauksys, Mindaugas [1 ]
Mockiene, Jurate [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture, LT-44249 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Kaunas Univ Appl Engn Sci, Fac Engn Sci, LT-50155 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
project management methodologies; PRINCE2; PMBOK; repetitive construction projects; DESIGN; DELAY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13071796
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Nowadays, companies employ various project management (PM) methodologies to ensure that their projects are effective and successful. It is worth knowing that differences in principles and processes of PM methodologies influence the use of different PMs in managing non-repetitive and repetitive construction projects. This paper presents the selection and application of a rational construction PM methodology to a repetitive construction project after a comparison of two PM methodologies, namely Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects IN Controlled Environments (PRINCE2). The object of this study is a repetitive anti-corrosion works project for steel structures conducted at Company X. The research was carried out in two steps. First, a quantitative survey of the respondents from companies involved in the management and execution of construction projects was conducted with the aim to identify a rational approach to construction PM. The questionnaire consisted of fourteen closed-ended questions, six of which were generic and eight were PMBOK- and PRINCE2-specific questions. Companies that took part in the quantitative study identified the PRINCE2 project management approach as the most suitable for managing a repetitive construction project. Using the PRINCE2 PM methodology, the repetitive construction project would aim to provide as much information as possible to the project participants, form a team and assign team leaders responsible for the phases, establish a financial plan, a detailed timetable for the execution of the works, a quality control plan, and a plan of responsible persons, and detail the technological sequencing of the works. Second, a quantitative study on the selection of a rational construction project management approach for a repetitive construction project was pursued, and a qualitative assessment of construction project monitoring trends and actions was conducted. The qualitative research was performed using a structured interview method and asking the representatives of different companies X, Y, and Z the same 15 questions. The results of the qualitative research showed that a successful PM depends on the size of the project team, the PM tools and methodologies used, the PM philosophy, and the frequency of monitoring and discussing the project progress.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]   Sustainable Environment to Prevent Burnout and Attrition in Project Management [J].
Govindaras, Baskaran ;
Wern, Tuan Sau ;
Kaur, Sharangeet ;
Haslin, Idris Akmal ;
Ramasamy, R. Kanesaraj .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
[32]   Tackling Design Anew: Getting Back to the Heart of Organizational Theory [J].
Greenwood, Royston ;
Miller, Danny .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (04) :78-88
[33]   Development of a Conceptual Critical Success Factors Model for Construction Projects: a Case of Lithuania [J].
Gudiene, Neringa ;
Banaitis, Audrius ;
Banaitiene, Nerija ;
Lopes, Jorge .
MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, 2013, 57 :392-397
[34]   Fuzzy Assessment Model to Estimate the Probability of Delay in Turkish Construction Projects [J].
Gunduz, Murat ;
Nielsen, Yasemin ;
Ozdemir, Mustafa .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (04)
[35]   Optimal planning and scheduling for repetitive construction projects [J].
Hyari, K ;
El-Rayes, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2006, 22 (01) :11-19
[36]   Construction project performance areas for Indian construction projects [J].
Ingle, Prachi Vinod ;
Mahesh, Gangadhar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (08) :1443-1454
[37]  
Jaziri R., 2018, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), V7, P113
[38]   Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide [J].
Kallio, Hanna ;
Pietila, Anna-Maija ;
Johnson, Martin ;
Kangasniemi, Mari .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (12) :2954-2965
[39]   Delay analysis method using delay section [J].
Kim, Y ;
Kim, K ;
Shin, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (11) :1155-1164
[40]  
Knowledge Train, 2021, PRINCE2 VS PMBOK GUI