Breastfeeding practices based on the gestational age and weight at birth in the first six months of life in a population-based cohort of infants from North India

被引:1
作者
Sharma, Sitanshi [1 ]
Chowdhury, Ranadip [1 ]
Taneja, Sunita [1 ]
Mazumder, Sarmila [1 ]
Bhatia, Kiran [1 ]
Ghosh, Runa [1 ]
Karantha, Sowmya C. [1 ]
Dhabhai, Neeta [1 ]
Chellani, Harish [2 ]
Bahl, Rajiv [3 ]
Bhandari, Nita [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hlth Res & Dev, Soc Appl Studies, New Delhi, India
[2] Safdarjang Hosp, Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll, Dept Pediat, New Delhi, India
[3] WHO, Dept Maternal Newborn Child & Adolescent Hlth, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
preterm; SGA; gestational age (GA); birth weight; breastfeeding; exclusive breast feeding (EBF); OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3389/fped.2023.1127885
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Short and long term benefits of early Initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in the first six months of life are well established and recommended globally. However, reliable estimates of breastfeeding practices and impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions according to gestational age and weight at birth are not available in low and middle income countries.Objective: To assess the impact of breastfeeding counselling on EIBF and EBF during the first 6 months of life according to gestational age and weight at birth.Methods: We analysed the data collected from the Women and Infants Integrated Interventions for Growth Study (WINGS), an individually randomized factorial design trial. Mothers were counselled on EIBF during third trimester of pregnancy. They were supported throughout the first 6 months to continue EBF by early problem identification, frequent home visits and assistance in expressing breastmilk when direct breastfeeding was not possible. Breastfeeding practices were ascertained through 24 h recalls at infant ages 1, 3 and 5 months for both the intervention and control groups by an independent outcome ascertainment team. The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions were used for classification of infant breastfeeding practices. Generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function were used to estimate the effect of interventions on breastfeeding practices. The relative measures of effect on breastfeeding practices were estimated in term appropriate for gestational age (T-AGA), term small for gestational age (T-SGA), preterm AGA (PT-AGA), preterm SGA (PT-SGA) infants.Results: Amongst all infants irrespective of gestational age and weight at birth, EIBF was (51.7%) higher amongst the intervention group (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48) compared with the control group. The proportion of exclusively breastfed infants at ages 1 month (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.48), 3 months (IRR 2.13, 95% CI 1.30-1.44) and 5 months (IRR 2.78, 95% CI 2.58-3.00) were higher in intervention group than control group. We identified significant interaction (p value for interaction <0.05) between intervention and infant size and gestation at birth on exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 5 months of age. Subgroup analysis showed that the impact of the intervention was greater on exclusive breastfeeding in PT- SGA infants at 3 months (IRR 3.30, 95% CI 2.20-4.96) and 5 months of age (IRR 5.26, 95% CI 2.98-9.28).Conclusion: This is one of the first studies wherein impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions in the first 6 months of life was assessed according to infant size and gestation at birth wherein gestational age was reliably estimated. The impact of this intervention was higher in preterm and SGA babies compared to other infants. This finding is important as preterm and SGA infants have a higher burden of mortality and morbidity during early infancy. Intensive breastfeeding counselling to these vulnerable infants is likely to improve overall breastfeeding rates and reduce the adverse outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
    Akindolire, Abimbola
    Talbert, Alison
    Sinha, Ian
    Embleton, Nicholas
    Allen, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, INDICATORS ASSESSING
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, World Heal Organ, P20
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Dietary Guidelines for Indians: A Manual
  • [5] Breastfeeding of preterm newborn infants following hospital discharge: follow-up during the first year of life
    Baker Meio, Maria Dalva Barbosa
    Villela, Leticia Duarte
    dos Santos Gomes Junio, Saint Clair
    Tovar, Camilla Morcelli
    Lopes Moreira, Maria Elisabeth
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2018, 23 (07): : 2403 - 2412
  • [6] Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis
    Chawanpaiboon, Saifon
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Moller, Ann-Beth
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Petzold, Max
    Hogan, Daniel
    Landoulsi, Sihem
    Jampathong, Nampet
    Kongwattanakul, Kiattisak
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lewis, Cameron
    Rattanakanokchai, Siwanon
    Teng, Ditza N.
    Thinkhamrop, Jadsada
    Watananirun, Kanokwaroon
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhou, Wei
    Gulmezoglu, A. Metin
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 7 (01): : E37 - E46
  • [7] Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chowdhury, Ranadip
    Sinha, Bireshwar
    Sankar, Mari Jeeva
    Taneja, Sunita
    Bhandari, Nita
    Rollins, Nigel
    Bahl, Rajiv
    Martines, Jose
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2015, 104 : 96 - 113
  • [8] Consortium IFaNG, 2009, INT FET NEWB GROWTH
  • [9] A prospective cohort study on lactation status and breastfeeding challenges in mothers giving birth to preterm infants
    Dong, Dingding
    Ru, Xifang
    Huang, Xiaofang
    Sang, Tian
    Li, Shan
    Wang, Ying
    Feng, Qi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BREASTFEEDING JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [10] ICF IIfPSIa, 2022, NATL FAMILY HLTH SUR