Charitable Giving Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Philippine Context

被引:0
作者
Palanca-Tan, Rosalina [1 ]
Tan, Nelson Matthew P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ateneo Manila Univ, Dept Econ, Quezon City 1108, Philippines
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Altruism; COVID-19; pandemic; Vaccines; Community pantry; Determinants of charitable giving; PHILANTHROPY; PREDICTORS; RELIGION; VICTIM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11294-023-09869-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a survey on altruism amidst economic difficulties during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The study looked at two cases of charitable giving: (1) intention to donate to a non-government COVID-19 vaccination program, and (2) food donation to a community pantry. A two-stage regression procedure was undertaken to identify the factors affecting the willingness to contribute to a vaccination program (first stage: binary logit regression) and the contribution amount (second stage: ordinary least squares). The binary logit regression was likewise used to identify donors' characteristics for the community pantries. The survey was conducted among 508 household heads in Metro Manila, Philippines in December 2021 using a multi-stage stratified sampling procedure. First, the study found that the proportion of respondents who expressed willingness to donate to a vaccination program is higher than the proportion of respondents who donated food to a community pantry, which could be due to the benefits (general reduction in the risk of contracting COVID-19) that donors also stood to gain from their contributions. Second, a past act of giving to a community pantry is not a robust predictor of donating to a vaccination program, implying that the decision to give depends on the specific charitable program, as supported by differing sets of robust predictors for the vaccination program (economic-related factors) and the community pantry (religiosity). Third, donating to a non-government COVID-19 vaccination program is income inelastic, implying that the donation is considered a basic consumption item.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 62
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica [J].
Alpizar, Francisco ;
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1047-1060
[2]   Charitable giving, income, and taxes: An analysis of panel data [J].
Auten, GE ;
Sieg, H ;
Clotfelter, CT .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (01) :371-382
[3]   Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands [J].
Bekkers, R .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2003, 32 (04) :596-615
[4]  
Bekkers R, 2008, REV RELIG RES, V50, P74
[5]   Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving Part One: Religion, education, age and socialisation [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2011, 2 (03) :337-365
[6]   Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment [J].
Bohnet, I ;
Frey, BS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01) :335-339
[7]   Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering [J].
Brown, Eleanor ;
Ferris, James M. .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2007, 36 (01) :85-99
[8]  
Chua, 2021, TOTAL COST COVID 19
[9]  
Department of Health, 2022, NAT COVID 19 VACC DA
[10]   Is moire information always better? an experimental study of charitable giving and hurricane katrina [J].
Eckel, Catherine ;
Grossman, Philip J. ;
Milanol, Angela .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 74 (02) :388-411