Perspectives on socio-ecological studies in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres

被引:3
作者
Herrera, Alejandro Huertas [1 ]
Toro-Manriquez, Monica D. R. [1 ]
Lorenzo, Cristian [2 ,3 ]
Lencinas, Maria Vanessa [2 ]
Pastur, Guillermo Martinez [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest Ecosistemas Patagonia CIEP, Coyhaique, Chile
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Ctr Austral Invest Cient CAD, Ushuaia, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Tierra Fuego UNTDF, Ushuaia, Argentina
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; LAND-USE; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; POLICY; SUSTAINABILITY; FISHERIES;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-01545-w
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Socio-ecology studies the relationships between human activities and natural systems and their importance in management and public policy. Our objective was to analyse how published papers in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) perform socio-ecological studies and compare them between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. To do this, we used the Scopus platform as a source for searching and obtaining scientific papers about socio-ecological studies conducted in countries from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. We calculated the number (n) of papers published per year and classified them using the main subject areas of the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database. Then, we analysed whether papers included specific recommendations for natural system management, nature conservation, policies or governance structures, or science in general. Besides, we studied whether the papers addressed socio-ecological studies related to flora and fauna and from what specific group of organisms or systems. Data were compared using the chi-square (chi(2)) test (Pearson p < 0.005). A total of 467 papers were analysed, where 34% were from the Southern Hemisphere (mainly Argentina, Australia, Chile, and South Africa) and 66% from the Northern Hemisphere (mainly the USA, Canada, and Spain). The Northern Hemisphere (mainly North America and Europe) played a major role in the socio-ecological knowledge exchange than the Southern Hemisphere (South America and Africa). The results showed socio-ecological studies focused mainly on generating management recommendations in social and environmental science fields. The number of studies coming from the Northern Hemisphere was significantly higher than those from the Southern Hemisphere. Most of them were conducted at a local level (e.g., watersheds or human settlements) in three different systems (i) terrestrial (e.g., forests or grasslands), (ii) freshwater (e.g., rivers or streams) and (iii) marine (e.g., coastlines or seas). Most of the studies (70%) were conducted in production systems, where the majority included livestock (mainly bovine) and aquatic fisheries (e.g., salmon, artisanal coastal fishing, or trout). Most vegetation papers (65%) were on native forests. Papers on wildlife made up 30% of all animal-related studies, with mammals, birds, and marine invertebrates (such as collars) being the most extensively researched species. This work highlighted the socio-ecological approach that was used in the analysed countries with greater HDI to develop management options for natural systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Socio-ecological vulnerability assessment in coastal communities in the BCLME region
    Sowman, Merle
    Raemaekers, Serge
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2018, 188 : 160 - 171
  • [22] Evaluating Risk and Possible Adaptations to Climate Change Under a Socio-Ecological System Approach
    Haro, Abi
    Mendoza-Ponce, Alma
    Calderon-Bustamante, Oscar
    Velasco, Julian A.
    Estrada, Francisco
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2021, 3
  • [23] "No research on a dead planet": preserving the socio-ecological conditions for academia
    Thierry, Aaron
    Horn, Laura
    von Hellermann, Pauline
    Gardner, Charlie J.
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [24] The importance of socio-ecological system dynamics in understanding adaptation to global change in the forestry sector
    Blanco, Victor
    Brown, Calum
    Holzhauer, Sascha
    Vulturius, Gregor
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 196 : 36 - 47
  • [25] Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability
    Azar, C
    Holmberg, J
    Lindgren, K
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) : 89 - 112
  • [26] Predicting the minimum scale of urban ecological space based on socio-ecological systems analysis
    Hong, Wuyang
    Liao, Chuangchang
    Guo, Renzhong
    An, Qi
    Li, Xiaoming
    Ma, Tao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 863
  • [27] Landscape performance evaluation in socio-ecological practice: current status and prospects
    Yang B.
    Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2020, 2 (1) : 91 - 104
  • [28] The socio-ecological resilience and sustainability implications of seafood supply chain disruption
    Subramaniam, Roshni C.
    Ruwet, Melodie
    Boschetti, Fabio
    Fielke, Simon
    Fleming, Aysha
    Dominguez-Martinez, Rosa Mar
    Plaganyi, Eva
    Schrobback, Peggy
    Melbourne-Thomas, Jessica
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2023, 33 (04) : 1129 - 1154
  • [29] Quantifying resilience of socio-ecological systems through dynamic Bayesian networks
    Franco-Gaviria, Felipe
    Amador-Jimenez, Monica
    Millner, Naomi
    Durden, Charlotte
    Urrego, Dunia H.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [30] What is socio-ecological research delivering? A literature survey across 25 international LTSER platforms
    Dick, Jan
    Orenstein, Daniel E.
    Holzer, Jennifer M.
    Wohner, Christoph
    Achard, Anne-Laure
    Andrews, Christopher
    Avriel-Avni, Noa
    Beja, Pedro
    Blond, Nadege
    Cabello, Javier
    Chen Chiling
    Diaz-Delgado, Ricardo
    Giannakis, Georgios, V
    Gingrich, Simone
    Izakovicova, Zita
    Krauze, Kinga
    Lamouroux, Nicolas
    Leca, Stefan
    Melecis, Viesturs
    Miklos, Kertesz
    Mimikou, Maria
    Niedrist, Georg
    Piscart, Christophe
    Postolache, Carmen
    Psomas, Alexander
    Santos-Reis, Margarida
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    Vanderbilt, Kristin
    Van Ryckegem, Gunther
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 622 : 1225 - 1240