Local protein sources for growing-finishing pigs and their effects on pig performance, sensory quality and climate impact of the produced pork

被引:13
|
作者
Stodkilde, Lene [1 ,2 ]
Mogensen, Lisbeth [3 ]
Bache, Julie Krogsdahl [4 ]
Ambye-Jensen, Morten [2 ,5 ]
Vinther, Jens [4 ]
Jensen, Soren Krogh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Foulum, Dept Anim & Vet Sci, Blichers 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Foulum, Ctr Circular Bioecon, CBIO, Blichers 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Foulum, Dept Agroecol, Blichers 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[4] SEGES Pig Res Ctr, Axelborg, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biol & Chem Engn, Hang ovej 2, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Sustainability; Pork production; Local protein sources; Performance; Sensory profile; Carbon footprint; SOIL CARBON CHANGES; ILEAL DIGESTIBILITY; AMINO-ACIDS; RAPESEED MEAL; CRUDE PROTEIN; FABA BEANS; FEED; CARCASS; SYSTEMS; DIETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105128
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The public demand for increased sustainability and reduced climate impact of the pork production incites using high yielding local protein sources as substitutes for the imported protein used presently. Substitution must be done without compromising the productivity, which could counteract the positive effect on climate impact.The aim of the study was to document the effects of replacing imported protein with local protein sources on animal productivity, meat quality and climate impact of pork production. Soybean and sunflower meal represented imported protein (group 1), and biorefined Green protein in combination with fava beans (group 2) and a price-competitive feed with fava beans and rapeseed cake (group 3) presented the local protein. Groups of 120 pigs were fed one of the three diets from 30 kg and until slaughter.Daily growth was not affected by diet, however daily feed intake was higher in group 2 (2.82 kg/pig/day) compared to group 1 and 3 (2.74 kg/pig/day and 2.70 kg/pig/day, respectively) (P=0.0039). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was lower in group 3 (2.47 kg feed/kg gain) compared to group 1 and 2 (2.52 kg feed/kg growth for both) (P=0.033). Sensory evaluation reported that meat from group 3 was more tender (P=0.003) and with lower chewing time (P<0.0001). The diet did not affect taste or odour of the meat. The carbon footprint (CF) per kg live weight (LW) of pig at farm gate was 10% lower for group 3 compared to group 1, and when the contributions from soil carbon changes and direct land use change (dLUC) were included, CF for group 3 pigs on the price-competitive local protein was 25 % lower than CF for group 1 pigs on imported protein. In this scenario, the CF of diet 2 was assumed to equal that of diet 3, and thereby CF of Green protein was quantified to 290 g CO2/kg DM.In conclusion, imported protein sources can be substituted with local protein without adverse effects on animal productivity. Biorefined Green protein can be included without compromising feed efficiency and meat sensory profile. The study demonstrated potential to reduce CF of pork by using feed with only locally produced protein sources like fava beans and rapeseed cake, and probably also Green protein, as the feeding trial indicated that local protein sources can successfully be sustainable alternatives to imported protein. However, further studies are needed to quantify the climate and environmental impact of Green protein.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of ValiMP® supplementation on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and pork quality in growing-finishing pigs
    Park, Min Young
    Choi, Sun-woo
    Kim, Jonggun
    Kwak, Minjin
    Whang, Kwang-Youn
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 344 - 345
  • [2] Effects of supplemental manganese on performance of growing-finishing pigs and pork quality during retail display
    Sawyer, J. T.
    Tittor, A. W.
    Apple, J. K.
    Morgan, J. B.
    Maxwell, C. V.
    Rakes, L. K.
    Fakler, T. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 (04) : 1046 - 1053
  • [3] The Impact of Dietary Crude Protein Level on Growth Performance of Growing-Finishing Pigs
    Xue, Pengcheng
    McGhee, Molly L.
    Pilcher, Chad M.
    Li, Qingyun
    Frederick, Brent
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 80 - 80
  • [4] Effects of environmental conditions on the performance of growing-finishing pigs
    Massabie, P
    Granier, R
    LeDividich, J
    LIVESTOCK ENVIRONMENT V, VOLS I AND II, 1997, : 1010 - 1016
  • [5] Effects of chito-oligosaccharides supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, pork quality and immune response in growing-finishing pigs
    Han, K. N.
    Yang, Y. X.
    Hahn, T. W.
    Kwon, I. K.
    Lohakare, J. D.
    Lee, J. K.
    Chae, B. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2007, 16 (04): : 607 - 620
  • [6] Effects of wheat supplementation levels on growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility, and pork quality in growing-finishing pigs
    Han, Tae Hee
    Hong, Jin Su
    Fang, Lin Hu
    Do, Sung Ho
    Kim, Byung Ock
    Kim, Yoo Yong
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (08): : 1150 - 1159
  • [7] Effects of fulvic acid on growth performance and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs
    Bai, H. X.
    Chang, Q. F.
    Shi, B. M.
    Shan, A. S.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2013, 158 (1-3) : 118 - 123
  • [8] Effects of 25(OH)VD3 on Growth Performance, Pork Quality and Calcium Deposit in Growing-Finishing Pigs
    Zhang, Zeyu
    Zhang, Gang
    Cao, Jindang
    Qiu, Baoqin
    Qin, Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Jinbiao
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [9] Effects of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles, high-protein distillers dried grains, and corn germ to growing-finishing pigs on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork
    Widmer, M. R.
    McGinnis, L. M.
    Wulf, D. M.
    Stein, H. H.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (08) : 1819 - 1831
  • [10] Effects of Guanidinoacetic Acid on Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Antioxidation in Growing-Finishing Pigs
    Wang, L. S.
    Shi, B. M.
    Shan, A. S.
    Zhang, Y. Y.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2012, 11 (05): : 63 - 68