Student evaluation of teaching: gender bias in a country at the forefront of gender equality

被引:14
作者
Sigudardottir, Margret Sigrun [1 ]
Rafnsdottir, Gudbjorg Linda [2 ]
Jonsdottir, Anna Helga [3 ]
Kristofersson, Dadi Mar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Business Adm, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Fac Social & Human Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Phys Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Higher education; student evaluations of teaching (SET); gender bias; gender equality; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2087604
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on gender equality in Higher Education indicates that female academics might not have the same opportunities for promotion as male academics. One of the are as in Higher Education where gender bias has been reported is in Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET). The aim of this article is to analyse possible gendered characteristics of communication between students and teachers in higher education, as reflected in SET. The article builds on mixed-method research. Five years of SET responses were analysed quantitatively and one year of open answers was analysed qualitatively. The qualitative data was then coded quantitatively. Iceland offers an excellent case for this study as it has been a forerunner in gender equality for years. The quantitative analysis shows that male students rate female teachers lower than their male counterparts, and the qualitative analyses indicate that the evaluation pattern of male and female teachers differs. Additionally, differences were found in the comments received by the teachers. Comments on male teachers referred to subject knowledge, while female teachers received comments on their service to students and relatability. There thus seems to be a gender bias in SET in Iceland despite its reputation for gender equality.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 967
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Algozzine B., 2004, COLL TEACH, V52, P134, DOI 10.3200/CTCH.52.4.134-141
[2]  
[Anonymous], ECONOMIST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, GLOBAL GENDER GAP RE
[4]   Academic identities research: mapping the field's theoretical frameworks [J].
Barrow, Mark ;
Grant, Barbara ;
Xu, Linlin .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 41 (02) :240-253
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]  
Boring A., 2016, Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness
[7]   Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching [J].
Boring, Anne .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 145 :27-41
[8]   Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in the Nordic Region [J].
Carlsson, Magnus ;
Finseraas, Henning ;
Midtboen, Arnfinn H. ;
Rafnsdottir, Guthbjorg Linda .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 37 (03) :399-410
[9]   The economic contribution of PhDs [J].
Casey, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 31 (03) :219-227
[10]   The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM [J].
Cech, Erin A. ;
Blair-Loy, Mary .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (10) :4182-4187