Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake: an online three-wave survey study of US adults

被引:0
作者
Thorpe, Alistair [1 ,2 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [1 ,3 ]
Drews, Frank A. [3 ,4 ]
Shoemaker, Holly [1 ,3 ]
Brecha, Federica S. [1 ,5 ]
Scherer, Laura D. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[3] Salt Lake City VA Informat Decis Enhancement & Ana, Ctr Innovat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Utah, Coll Social & Behav Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Denver VA Ctr Innovat, Denver, CO USA
关键词
COVID-19; vaccines; Mass vaccination; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccination coverage; Public health; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; VALIDATION; BEHAVIORS; HESITANCY; NUMERACY; BENEFIT; TRENDS; RISKS;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-024-09148-9
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background To effectively promote vaccine uptake, it is important to understand which people are most and least inclined to be vaccinated and why. In this study, we examined predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and reasons for non-vaccination. Methods We conducted an online English-language survey study in December-2020, January-2021, and March-2021. A total of 930 US respondents completed all surveys. Multiple logistic regression models were run to test whether the early vaccine eligibility, demographic factors, and psychological factors predict getting at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccination in January-2021 and in March-2021. Results The proportion of respondents who received >= 1-dose of a COVID-19 vaccine increased from 18% (January) to 67% (March). Older age predicted vaccine uptake in January (OR = 2.02[95%CI = 1.14-3.78], p < .001) and March (10.92[6.76-18.05], p < .001). In January, additional predictors were higher numeracy (1.48[1.20-1.86], p < .001), COVID-19 risk perceptions (1.35[1.03-1.78], p = .029), and believing it is important adults get the COVID-19 vaccine (1.66[1.05-2.66], p = .033). In March, additional predictors of uptake were believing it is important adults get the COVID-19 vaccine (1.63[1.15-2.34], p = .006), prior COVID-19 vaccine intentions (1.37[1.10-1.72], p = .006), and belief in science (0.84[0.72-0.99], p = .041). Concerns about side effects and the development process were the most common reasons for non-vaccination. Unvaccinated respondents with no interest in getting a COVID-19 vaccine were younger (0.27[0.09-0.77], p = .016), held negative views about COVID-19 vaccines for adults (0.15[0.08-0.26], p < .001), had lower trust in healthcare (0.59[0.36-0.95], p = .032), and preferred to watch and wait in clinically ambiguous medical situations (0.66[0.48-0.89], p = .007). Conclusions Evidence that attitudes and intentions towards COVID-19 vaccines were important predictors of uptake provides validation for studies using these measures and reinforces the need to develop strategies for addressing safety and development concerns which remain at the forefront of vaccine hesitancy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Allington D, Psychological Medicine, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], COVID-19 Vaccines At VA
  • [3] Vaccine Efficacy Needed for a COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine to Prevent or Stop an Epidemic as the Sole Intervention
    Bartsch, Sarah M.
    O'Shea, Kelly J.
    Ferguson, Marie C.
    Bottazzi, Maria Elena
    Wedlock, Patrick T.
    Strych, Ulrich
    McKinnell, James A.
    Siegmund, Sheryl S.
    Cox, Sarah N.
    Hotez, Peter J.
    Lee, Bruce Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (04) : 493 - 503
  • [4] Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination
    Betsch, Cornelia
    Schmid, Philipp
    Heinemeier, Dorothee
    Korn, Lars
    Holtmann, Cindy
    Boehm, Robert
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [5] Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19
    Callaghan, Timothy
    Moghtaderi, Ali
    Lueck, Jennifer A.
    Hotez, Peter
    Strych, Ulrich
    Dor, Avi
    Fowler, Erika Franklin
    Motta, Matthew
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 272
  • [6] Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023, COVID DAT TRACK
  • [7] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [8] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination during June-October 2021: A multi-site prospective study
    Datar, Reva S.
    Fette, Lida M.
    Hinkelman, Amy N.
    Hammershaimb, E. Adrianne
    Friedman-Klabanoff, DeAnna J.
    Mongraw-Chaffin, Morgana
    Weintraub, William S.
    Ahmed, Naheed
    Gibbs, Michael A.
    Runyon, Michael S.
    Plumb, Ian D.
    Thompson, William
    Saydah, Sharon
    Edelstein, Sharon L.
    Berry, Andrea A.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2023, 41 (20) : 3204 - 3214
  • [9] Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study
    de Figueiredo, Alexandre
    Simas, Clarissa
    Karafillakis, Emilie
    Paterson, Pauline
    Larson, Heidi J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10255) : 898 - 908
  • [10] COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Adults - United States, December 14, 2020-May 22, 2021
    Diesel, Jill
    Sterrett, Natalie
    Dasgupta, Sharoda
    Kriss, Jennifer L.
    Barry, Vaughn
    Vanden Esschert, Kayla
    Whiteman, Ari
    Cadwell, Betsy L.
    Weller, Daniel
    Qualters, Judith R.
    Harris, LaTreace
    Bhatt, Achal
    Williams, Charnetta
    Fox, LeAnne M.
    Delman, Dana Meaney
    Black, Carla L.
    Barbour, Kamil E.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2021, 70 (25): : 922 - 927