Nonlinear predictable feature learning with explanatory reasoning for complicated industrial system fault diagnosis

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Xuepeng [1 ]
Deng, Xiaogang [1 ]
Cao, Yuping [1 ]
Xiao, Linbo [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Control Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266555, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Graph -based predictable feature analysis; Random fourier feature; Wasserstein distance; Contribution analysis; Transfer entropy;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111404
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As an emerging temporal data analytical tool, graph-based predictable feature analysis (GPFA) has been successfully introduced to perform dynamic system monitoring. Nevertheless, two critical problems still need to be solved: extracting nonlinear predictable features (PFs) efficiently and explaining fault propagation path. In order to handle these two problems, this article proposes a nonlinear predictable feature learning method with explanatory reasoning for complicated industrial fault diagnosis. Unlike traditional kernel-based nonlinear machine learning methods, this approach utilizes random Fourier mapping to build the nonlinear GPFA model. This kind of nonlinear GPFA model has a more straightforward structure and achieves higher computation efficiency. Furthermore, for the sensitivity in fault detection, the probabilistic non-linear PFs are designed using Wasserstein distance (WD) to measure the difference between two probability distributions. To deal with the challenging issue of fault explanatory reasoning, a hierarchical cause-propagation-result (CPR) diagram is constructed to trace the paths of fault propagation and indicate the possible root causes. Finally, the validity of the methodology is demonstrated by simulation experiments of two systems with a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The transfer learning of uncertainty quantification for industrial plant fault diagnosis system design
    Blair, J.
    Amin, O.
    Brown, B.D.
    McArthur, S.
    Forbes, A.
    Stephen, B.
    Data-Centric Engineering, 2024, 5
  • [22] Fault diagnosis for industrial printers using case-based reasoning
    Grant, PW
    Harris, PM
    Moseley, LG
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 9 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [23] Fault diagnosis for sensors in nonlinear system
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao, 6 (36-39):
  • [24] Fuzzy reasoning method in expert system for fault diagnosis
    Mei, Shengmin
    Xu, Hongchang
    Zhang, Youzhen
    Nanjing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 1995, 27 (04):
  • [25] The implementation of functional modeling for fault diagnosis of complicated system
    Zhu, J
    Wang, HX
    ICEMI'99: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 619 - 621
  • [26] Research on Fault Diagnosis Techniques of Complicated Electrical System
    Ji Bo-gong
    Wang Jia
    Zhang Bo
    ISTM/2009: 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2773 - 2776
  • [27] Power System Fault Diagnosis Based on Fault Information System and Forward and Backward Reasoning
    Liu Sihua
    Chen Qing
    Gao Tipan
    2009 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), VOLS 1-7, 2009, : 1293 - 1295
  • [28] Self-Explanatory Fault Diagnosis Framework for Industrial Processes Using Graph Attention
    Kim, Chae Sun
    Kim, Han Bit
    Lee, Jong Min
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2025,
  • [29] Industrial process fault diagnosis based on feature enhanced meta-learning toward domain scenarios
    Gao, Yu
    Qi, Jin
    Sun, Ying
    Hu, Xiaoxuan
    Dong, Zhenjiang
    Sun, Yanfei
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2024, 289
  • [30] Deep network model fusion of wide kernel feature learning for industrial process modeling and fault diagnosis
    Chen, Youqiang
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhang, Ridong
    Gao, Furong
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2025, 194 : 1283 - 1302