Component-Based Modeling for Steel and Composite Beam-Column Joints Subjected to Quasi-Static and Impact Loads under Column Removal Scenarios

被引:1
作者
Chen, Kang [1 ]
Yang, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 111 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, 83 Shabeijie, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
关键词
Fin plate; Welded unreinforced flange-bolted web (WUF-B); Composite joint; Progressive collapse; Impact load; WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE; 2 HIGHRISE BUILDINGS; SHAPE CORRECTIONS; TALL BUILDINGS; MOTION;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12070
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper describes a component-based modeling approach for bare steel and composite beam-column joints subjected to quasi-static and impact loads under column removal scenarios. Two types of beam-column joints, viz. fin plate and welded unreinforced flange with bolted web, were simulated using the component-based modeling approach. The beam-column joints were discretized into individual springs consisting of various components. Material and geometry of the components were used to determine mechanical properties and failure criteria of the springs. After that, the springs were assembled together in a finite element package ABAQUS and component-based models were built. The joint models were validated against test results under quasi-static and impact loading scenarios. It was found that the component-based modeling approach performed well for both scenarios, with most of the relative errors less than 10%. Structural behavior of beam-column joints, including the development of load, axial force and bending moment for quasi-static loading scenario, as well as the development of displacement, axial force and bending moment for impact loading scenario could be captured by numerical simulations. The assumptions and limitations of the proposed modeling approach are presented as well.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan), 2004, Recommendations for loads on buildings
  • [2] AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan), 2015, Recommendations for loads on buildings
  • [3] Alinejad H., 2020, P 2020 WORLD C ADV C
  • [4] Comparative assessment of ASCE 7-16 and KBC 2016 for determination of design wind loads for tall buildings
    Alinejad, Hamidreza
    Jeong, Seung Yong
    Kang, Thomas H. -K.
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 31 (06) : 575 - 591
  • [5] Engineering Review of ASCE 7-16 Wind-Load Provisions and Wind Effect on Tall Concrete-Frame Buildings
    Alinejad, Hamidreza
    Kang, Thomas H. -K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (06)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, Wind actions on structures
  • [7] AS/NZS (Australian/New Zealand Standard), 2011, AS/NZS 1170.2-2011
  • [8] Asami Y., 2000, PROC 16 NATL S WIND, P531
  • [9] ASCE, 2021, Wind tunnel testing for buildings and other structures
  • [10] ASCE, 2010, 710 ASCESEI