Party and Party System Institutionalization: Which Comes First?

被引:3
|
作者
Bertoa, Fernando Casal [1 ,2 ]
Enyedi, Zsolt [3 ]
Molder, Martin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Polit & Int Relat, Nottingham, England
[2] REPRESENT Res Ctr Study Parties & Democracy, Nottingham, England
[3] Cent European Univ, Polit Sci Dept, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Tartu, Comparat Polit, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
ELECTORAL VOLATILITY; PANEL-DATA; STABILIZATION; INSTABILITY; CAUSALITY; DYNAMICS; MODELS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1017/S1537592723002530
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Parties and party systems are treated as separate phenomena in theory, but not in research practice. This is most clearly so in the literature on the institutionalization of party politics, where the party level and the systemic levels are often analyzed through combined fuzzy indices. We 1) propose separate indicators for measuring institutionalization at the party and at the party system level, 2) demonstrate their different dynamics in twentieth and twenty-first century European countries, and 3) investigate the direction of causality. Using a dataset that covers more than 700 elections, 800 parties, and 1,400 instances of government formation in 60 different historical party systems across 45 European countries, we find that party-level institutionalization tends to precede systemic institutionalization. The opposite pattern occurs only in a few countries.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 212
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条