Calf management and welfare in the Canadian and US dairy industries: Where do we go from here?

被引:14
作者
Roche, S. [1 ,2 ]
Renaud, D. L. [1 ]
Bauman, C. A. [1 ]
Lombard, J. [3 ]
Short, D. [4 ]
Saraceni, J. [2 ]
Kelton, D. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] ACER Consulting, Guelph, ON N1G 5L3, Canada
[3] USDA Anim & Plant Hlth Inspect Serv Vet Serv, Field Epidemiol Invest Serv, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[4] USDA Anim & Plant Hlth Inspection Serv Vet Serv, Ctr Epidemiol & Anim Hlth, Natl Anim Hlth Monitoring Syst, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
关键词
benchmarking; welfare; National Dairy Study; National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS); pain management; LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY; CALVES FED MILK; RISK-FACTORS; COLOSTRUM MANAGEMENT; RESPIRATORY-DISEASE; REPLACEMENT HEIFERS; PASSIVE-IMMUNITY; WEIGHT GAINS; CALVING EASE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2022-22793
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this narrative review was to com-pare the results of the 2015 Canadian National Dairy Study and the 2014 US National Animal Health Moni-toring System (NAHMS) Dairy Studies, with a specific focus on calf management and welfare, and to interpret these findings within more recent calf health research to describe where we need to go next in the North American dairy industry. Situating results of periodic national studies within the context of past and recent research provides an opportunity to gauge adoption of recommendations and best practices and to help iden-tify persistent and new challenges that the industry is wrestling with to help guide research needs. Through this review of the 2 national studies, we identified sev-eral strengths of the Canadian and US dairy industries. In each area of calf health management, improvements relative to previous NAHMS studies and the published literature have been found in the level of mortality, amount of colostrum fed, housing, and the number of producers using pain control for disbudding and de -horning. There were, however, some areas that present clear opportunities for improvement. Specifically, al-though mortality levels have improved, a large number of calves die at birth, within the first 48 h of life, and during the preweaning period. To improve the health of calves in early life, producers could look at feeding high-quality colostrum at 10% of body weight in the first feeding, as well as feeding a larger amount of milk during the preweaning period. The barriers to mak-ing these management changes and improving overall calf health need to be identified in future studies. The majority of preweaning calves in Canada and the United States are housed in individual housing. This represents a clear opportunity for improvement because recent research has identified the positive aspects of group housing. Finally, with respect to pain control, improvements are needed (particularly in the United States) to ensure that pain management is provided when disbudding and dehorning calves. Although the science is clear on pain management, discussions with producers are needed to identify reasons for the lack of uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:4266 / 4274
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Where do we go from here? A small scale observation of transfer results from chronic to skilled ventilator facilities [J].
Greenough, William B., III ;
Ahmed, Maaz ;
Finucane, Thomas ;
Galiatsatos, Panagis ;
Weiss, Carlos ;
Bellantoni, Michele .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (06) :1400-1402
[32]   The Evolution of Assessing Central Nervous System Complications in Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Where Do We Go From Here? [J].
McIntosh, Roger C. ;
Clark, Uraina S. ;
Cherner, Mariana ;
Cysique, Lucette A. ;
Heaton, Robert K. ;
Levin, Jules ;
Remien, Robert H. ;
Thames, April ;
Moore, David J. ;
Rubin, Leah H. .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 227 (SUPP1) :S30-S37
[33]   Changing Direction in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care Where Do We Go From Here? [J].
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
Hochberg, Claudia P. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (07) :712-714
[34]   Where Do We Go From Here: Reflections on a Century in Women's Cardiovascular Health Research, 1924-2024 [J].
Bello, Natalie A. ;
Cheng, Susan .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2024, 134 (03) :247-251
[35]   ALPPS-Where Do We Stand, Where Do We Go? Eight Recommendations From the First International Expert Meeting [J].
Oldhafer, Karl J. ;
Stavrou, Gregor A. ;
van Gulik, Thomas M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (05) :839-841
[36]   Challenges in the identification of inherited risk of ovarian cancer: where should we go from here? [J].
Norquist, Barbara M. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 152 (01) :3-6
[37]   A critical appraisal of 40 years of avian collision risk modelling: How have we got here and where do we go next? [J].
Cook, Aonghais S. C. P. ;
Salkanovic, Eldina ;
Masden, Elizabeth ;
Lee, Hsiu Eik ;
Kiilerich, Alexander Holm .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 110
[38]   The 50th Anniversary of the US Surgeon General's Report on Tobacco: What We've Accomplished and Where We Go From Here A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association [J].
Antman, Elliott ;
Arnett, Donna ;
Jessup, Mariell ;
Sherwin, Chris .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2014, 3 (01) :e000740
[39]   w Carotid Stenosis: From Diagnosis to Management, Where Do We Stand? [J].
Gokaldas, Reshma ;
Singh, Maheep ;
Lal, Sonia ;
Benenstein, Ricardo J. ;
Sahni, Ramandeep .
CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2015, 17 (02)
[40]   County-level Predictors of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cases and Deaths in the United States: What Happened, and Where Do We Go from Here? [J].
McLaughlin, John M. ;
Khan, Farid ;
Pugh, Sarah ;
Angulo, Frederick J. ;
Schmitt, Heinz-Josef ;
Isturiz, Raul E. ;
Jodar, Luis ;
Swerdlow, David L. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (07) :E1814-E1821