The Tangle of Autonomy, Beneficence, Liberty, and Consent in the CESS Debate

被引:0
作者
Peterson, Stephanie M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, 2314 Friedmann Hall, Mail Stop 5398, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
关键词
Contingent electric skin shock; Bioethics; Autonomy; Beneficence; Intellectual and developmental disabilities; Choice;
D O I
10.1007/s40614-023-00378-x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This commentary on the task force report addresses the complex issues involved in autonomy, beneficence, liberty, and consent, which are often in competition in this and many other treatment issues for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, especially those with limited vocal/verbal repertoires. The issues at hand are multifaceted, and behavior analysts should be aware there is much we do not know enough about. As good scientists, it is important to maintain an attitude of philosophic doubt and endeavor to deepen understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Beauchamp T. L., 2013, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
  • [2] Katz J, 1994, J Contemp Health Law Policy, V10, P69
  • [3] National Autism Center, 2015, FIND CONCL NAT STA 2
  • [4] Retrospective views of psychiatric in-patients regaining mental capacity
    Owen, Gareth S.
    David, Anthony S.
    Hayward, Peter
    Richardson, Genevra
    Szmukler, George
    Hotopf, Matthew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 195 (05) : 403 - 407
  • [5] Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
    Scholten, Matthe
    Gather, Jakov
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (04) : 226 - 233
  • [6] Shalowitz D. I., 2006, PLOS MED, V4, P35
  • [7] Thornburgh v. Am, 1986, THORNBURGH AM COLL O, V747, P781
  • [8] United Nations, CONV RIGHTS PERS DIS