Imaging of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Survey Results and Expert Opinion from the Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology

被引:2
|
作者
Pernicka, Jennifer S. Golia S. [1 ,6 ]
Rauch, Gaiane M. [2 ]
Gangai, Natalie [1 ]
Bates, David D. B. [1 ]
Ernst, Randy [2 ]
Hope, Thomas A. [3 ,4 ]
Horvat, Natally [1 ]
Sheedy, Shannon P. [5 ]
Gollub, Marc J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biomed Imaging & Pharmaceut Chem, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] 530 E 74th St,Room 07118, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Anal squamous cell carcinoma; Anal cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; computed tomography; Computed tomography; Expert opinion; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; MRI; IMPACT; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-03863-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The role and method of image-based staging of anal cancer has evolved with the rapid development of newer imaging modalities and the need to address the rising incidence of this rare cancer. In 2014, the European Society of Medical Oncology mandated pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for anal cancer and subsequently other societies such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network followed suit with similar recommendations. Nevertheless, great variability exists from center to center and even within individual centers. Notably, this is in stark contrast to the imaging of the anatomically nearby rectal cancer. As participating team members for this malignancy, we embarked on a comprehensive literature review of anal cancer imaging to understand the relative merits of these new technologies which developed after computed tomography (CT), e.g., MRI and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The results of this literature review helped to inform our next stage: questionnaire development regarding the imaging of anal cancer. Next, we distributed the questionnaire to members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Rectal and Anal Disease-Focused Panel, a group of abdominal radiologists with special interest, experience, and expertise in rectal and anal cancer, to provide expert radiologist opinion on the appropriate anal cancer imaging strategy. In our expert opinion survey, experts advocated the use of MRI in general (65% overall and 91-100% for primary staging clinical scenarios) and acknowledged the superiority of PET/CT for nodal assessment (52-56% agreement for using PET/CT in primary staging clinical scenarios compared to 30% for using MRI). We therefore support the use of MRI and PET and suggest further exploration of PET/MRI as an optimal combined evaluation. Our questionnaire responses emphasized the heterogeneity in imaging practice as performed at numerous academic cancer centers across the United States and underscore the need for further reconciliation and establishment of best imaging practice guidelines for optimized patient care in anal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3022 / 3032
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Imaging of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Survey Results and Expert Opinion from the Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology
    Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
    Gaiane M. Rauch
    Natalie Gangai
    David D. B. Bates
    Randy Ernst
    Thomas A. Hope
    Natally Horvat
    Shannon P. Sheedy
    Marc J. Gollub
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3022 - 3032
  • [2] Rectal cancer lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology rectal & anal cancer disease-focused panel
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Gollub, Marc J.
    Arya, Supreeta
    Bates, David D. B.
    Ganeshan, Dhakshinamoorthy
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Jhaveri, Kartik S.
    Kassam, Zahra
    Kim, David H.
    Korngold, Elena
    Lalwani, Neeraj
    Moreno, Courtney C.
    Nougaret, Stephanie
    Paroder, Viktoriya
    Paspulati, Raj M.
    Pernicka, Jennifer S. Golia
    Petkovska, Iva
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Rosenthal, Michael H.
    Sheedy, Shannon P.
    Horvat, Natally
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (11) : 3508 - 3517
  • [3] Rectal cancer lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology rectal & anal cancer disease-focused panel
    Thomas A. Hope
    Marc J. Gollub
    Supreeta Arya
    David D. B. Bates
    Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Kartik S. Jhaveri
    Zahra Kassam
    David H. Kim
    Elena Korngold
    Neeraj Lalwani
    Courtney C. Moreno
    Stephanie Nougaret
    Viktoriya Paroder
    Raj M. Paspulati
    Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
    Iva Petkovska
    Perry J. Pickhardt
    Gaiane M. Rauch
    Michael H. Rosenthal
    Shannon P. Sheedy
    Natally Horvat
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 3508 - 3517
  • [4] Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel
    Lee, Sonia
    Kassam, Zahra
    Baheti, Akshay D.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Chang, Kevin J.
    Korngold, Elena K.
    Taggart, Melissa W.
    Horvat, Natally
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (09) : 2792 - 2806
  • [5] Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel
    Sonia Lee
    Zahra Kassam
    Akshay D. Baheti
    Thomas A. Hope
    Kevin J. Chang
    Elena K. Korngold
    Melissa W. Taggart
    Natally Horvat
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2792 - 2806
  • [6] Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel
    Jha, Priyanka
    Sakala, Michelle
    Chamie, Luciana Pardini
    Feldman, Myra
    Hindman, Nicole
    Huang, Chenchan
    Kilcoyne, Aoife
    Laifer-Narin, Sherelle
    Nicola, Refky
    Poder, Liina
    Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha
    Tong, Angela
    VanBuren, Wendy
    Taffel, Myles T.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (06) : 1552 - 1568
  • [7] Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel on renal cell carcinoma: update on past, current, and future goals
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Curci, Nicole E.
    Doshi, Ankur
    Kaffenberger, Samuel D.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Remer, Erick M.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Shinagare, Atul B.
    Smith, Andrew D.
    Wang, Zhen J.
    Wells, Shane A.
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (09) : 2213 - 2220
  • [8] Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel
    Priyanka Jha
    Michelle Sakala
    Luciana Pardini Chamie
    Myra Feldman
    Nicole Hindman
    Chenchan Huang
    Aoife Kilcoyne
    Sherelle Laifer-Narin
    Refky Nicola
    Liina Poder
    Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle
    Angela Tong
    Wendy VanBuren
    Myles T. Taffel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 1552 - 1568
  • [9] Lexicon for renal mass terms at CT and MRI: a consensus of the society of abdominal radiology disease-focused panel on renal cell carcinoma
    Shinagare, Atul B.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Park, Hyesun
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Remer, Erick M.
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Doshi, Ankur M.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Smith, Andrew D.
    Vikram, Raghunandan
    Wang, Zhen J.
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (02) : 703 - 722
  • [10] Radiotherapy of anal and rectal cancer Squamous cell anal carcinoma from a radiologic perspective
    Madlung, A.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 41 (04) : 255 - 261