Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models

被引:9
作者
Ayuso, Sullivan A. [1 ]
Elhage, Sharbel A. [1 ]
Zhang, Yizi [2 ]
Aladegbami, Bola G. [3 ]
Gersin, Keith S. [1 ]
Fischer, John P. [4 ]
Augenstein, Vedra A. [1 ]
Colavita, Paul D. [1 ]
Heniford, Todd [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invas Surg, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Stat, New York, NY USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Ctr Adv Surg, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invas Surg, Dept Surg, 1025 Morehead Med Dr Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA
关键词
VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; MESH; COMPLICATIONS; RISK; STRATEGIES; RECURRENCE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Deep learning models with imbalanced data sets are a challenge in the fields of artificial intelligence and surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and compare deep learning models that predict rare but devastating postoperative complications after abdominal wall reconstruction.Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify abdominal wall reconstruction patients with preoperative computed tomography scans. Conventional deep learning models were developed using an 8-layer convolutional neural network and a 2-class training system (ie, learns negative and positive outcomes). Conventional deep learning models were compared to deep learning models that were developed using a generative adversarial network anomaly framework, which uses image augmentation and anomaly detection. The primary outcomes were receiver operating characteristic values for predicting mesh infection and pulmonary failure.Results: Computed tomography scans from 510 patients were used with a total of 10,004 images. Mesh infection and pulmonary failure occurred in 3.7% and 5.6% of patients, respectively. The conventional deep learning models were less effective than generative adversarial network anomaly for predicting mesh infection (receiver operating characteristic 0.61 vs 0.73, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (receiver operating characteristic 0.59 vs 0.70, P < .01). Although the conventional deep learning models had higher accuracies/specificities for predicting mesh infection (0.93 vs 0.78, P < .01/.96 vs .78, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (0.88 vs 0.68, P < .01/.92 vs .67, P < .01), they were substantially compromised by decreased model sensitivity (0.25 vs 0.68, P < .01/.27 vs .73, P < .01).Conclusion: Compared to conventional deep learning models, generative adversarial network anomaly deep learning models showed improved performance on imbalanced data sets, predominantly by increasing model sensitivity. Understanding patients who are at risk for rare but devastating post-operative complications can improve risk stratification, resource utilization, and the consent process.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 755
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] GANomaly: Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Training
    Akcay, Samet
    Atapour-Abarghouei, Amir
    Breckon, Toby P.
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION - ACCV 2018, PT III, 2019, 11363 : 622 - 637
  • [2] CeDAR: Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    Colavita, Paul D.
    Wormer, Blair A.
    Walters, Amanda L.
    Bradley, Joel F.
    Lincourt, Amy E.
    Horton, James
    Heniford, B. Todd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (04) : S65 - S66
  • [3] Smoking, Obesity, and the Elective Operation
    Ayuso, Sullivan A.
    Robinson, Jordan N.
    Colavita, Paul D.
    Heniford, B. Todd
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 101 (06) : 981 - 993
  • [4] Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Liu, Yaoming
    Paruch, Jennifer L.
    Zhou, Lynn
    Kmiecik, Thomas E.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Cohen, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) : 833 - +
  • [5] Predicting Severe Postoperative Respiratory Complications following Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Blatnik, Jeffrey A.
    Krpata, David M.
    Pesa, Nicholas L.
    Will, Peter
    Harth, Karem C.
    Novitsky, Yuri W.
    Rowbottom, James R.
    Rosen, Michael J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (04) : 836 - 841
  • [6] Bloice M.D., 2017, Journal of Open Source Software, DOI [DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00432, 10.21105/joss.00432]
  • [7] ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves
    Carter, Jane V.
    Pan, Jiamnin
    Rai, Shesh N.
    Galandiuk, Susan
    [J]. SURGERY, 2016, 159 (06) : 1638 - 1645
  • [8] Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Darehzereshki, Ali
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Moazzez, Ashkan
    Lipham, John C.
    Mason, Rodney J.
    Katkhouda, Namir
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [9] Deep learning-based quantitative visualization and measurement of extraperitoneal hematoma volumes in patients with pelvic fractures: Potential role in personalized forecasting and decision support
    Dreizin, David
    Zhou, Yuyin
    Chen, Tina
    Li, Guang
    Yuille, Alan L.
    McLenithan, Ashley
    Morrison, Jonathan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 88 (03) : 425 - 433
  • [10] Development and Validation of Image-Based Deep Learning Models to Predict Surgical Complexity and Complications in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Elhage, Sharbel Adib
    Deerenberg, Eva Barbara
    Ayuso, Sullivan Armando
    Murphy, Keith Joseph
    Shao, Jenny Meng
    Kercher, Kent Williams
    Smart, Neil James
    Fischer, John Patrick
    Augenstein, Vedra Abdomerovic
    Colavita, Paul Dominick
    Heniford, B. Todd
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (10) : 933 - 940