Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO2 Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge

被引:27
|
作者
Subraveti, Sai Gokul [1 ]
Angel, Elda Rodriguez [2 ]
Ramirez, Andrea [2 ]
Roussanaly, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Energy Res, N-7019 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 Delft, Netherlands
关键词
carbon capture and storage; CO2; reduction; cost-benefit analysis; cost analysis; emissions;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.2c05724
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO2 emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user's one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO2 emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (similar to 1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO2 emissions (similar to 51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS.
引用
收藏
页码:2595 / 2601
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Was the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in Japan Related to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)-CO2 Injection? Insights From Geomechanical Analysis
    Lei, Xinglin
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [12] A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage -: Part B:: Chain analysis of promising CCS options
    Damen, Kay
    van Troost, Martijn
    Faaij, Andre
    Turkenburg, Wim
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (06) : 580 - 609
  • [13] Integrating carbon capture and utilization into the glass industry: Economic analysis of emissions reduction through CO2 mineralization
    Caudle, Benjamin
    Taniguchi, Satoshi
    Nguyen, Thuy T. H.
    Kataoka, Sho
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 416
  • [14] Increased N2O emission by inhibited plant growth in the CO2 leaked soil environment: Simulation of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) site
    Kim, You Jin
    He, Wenmei
    Ko, Daegeun
    Chung, Haegeun
    Yoo, Gayoung
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 607 : 1278 - 1285
  • [15] Adsorption of CO2 on ZSM-5 and Cu-MOF at room temperature and low pressure conditions for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) application
    Daud, N. K.
    Najib, N. H. I. M.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 57 : 1345 - 1355
  • [16] Reduction of carbon intensity of electrification by reservoir-to-wire integration with CO2 capture and storage: conceptual design and analysis
    Icaro B. Boa Morte
    Israel Bernardo S. Poblete
    Cláudia R. V. Morgado
    Ana Paula S. Musse
    José Luiz de Medeiros
    Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2024, 26 : 217 - 233
  • [17] Reduction of carbon intensity of electrification by reservoir-to-wire integration with CO2 capture and storage: conceptual design and analysis
    Morte, Icaro B. Boa
    Poblete, Israel Bernardo S.
    Morgado, Claudia R. V.
    Musse, Ana Paula S.
    de Medeiros, Jose Luiz
    Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz Fernandes
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, 26 (02) : 511 - 532