Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins

被引:7
|
作者
Belmouaz, Mohamed [1 ]
Goussard, Guillaume [1 ]
Joly, Florent [1 ]
Sibille, Audrey [1 ]
Martin, Cecile [1 ]
Betous, Thomas [1 ]
Thierry, Antoine [1 ]
Bauwens, Marc [1 ]
Bridoux, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Poitiers, France
关键词
Hemodialysis; Hemodiafiltration; Medium cut-off; Super high flux; Kappa and lambda free light chains; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1159/000526891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux (SHF) dialyzers have been implemented to enhance the removal of middle molecules (MM). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different dialysis strategies and dialyzers on small solutes and MM reduction ratio (RR) and mass removal. Methods: We performed a prospective study in 8 HD patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions: seven sessions on HD using either Theranova 500 (TM), Elisio 21H (TM), Renak PS-2.0W (TM), Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM), Vie 21X (TM), TS-2.1UL (TM) or FDY 210-GW (TM) dialyzers and two sessions on OL-HDF using Elisio 21H (TM) or Renak PS-2.0W (TM) dialyzers. Results: Urea mass removal and RR were similar between all dialysis strategies. The lowest beta2-microglobulin RR was achieved with Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM) HD (p < 0.05). Compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD, Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF produced higher beta2-microglobulin mass removal (181 +/- 46 vs. 317 +/- 161 mg, p < 0.05). Theranova 500 (TM) HD, Vie 21X (TM) HD, FDY 210-GW (TM) HD, Elisio 21H (TM) OL-HDF, and Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF induced higher RR for kappa and lambda FLC, as compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD and Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM) HD (p < 0.05). Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF achieved higher kappa FLC mass removal compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD (563 +/- 515 vs. 141 +/- 47 mg, p < 0.01) and to Renak PS-2.0W (TM) HD (563 +/- 515 vs. 153 +/- 25 mg, p < 0.05). Albumin loss varied from 0.02 +/- 0.05 to 7.6 +/- 3.8 g/session with Elisio 21H (TM) HD and Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF, respectively. Compared to all other strategies, Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF induced a significantly higher albumin loss (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study confirms that albumin loss and removal of MM are similar using conventional Elisio 21H (TM) OL-HDF, MCO-HD, and SHF type V dialyzers. Although Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF provides high performance for MM depuration, this protein-permeable dialyzer should not be used in OL-HDF because of excessive albumin loss.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized controlled trial of medium cut-off versus high-flux dialyzers on quality of life outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients
    Lim, Jeong-Hoon
    Park, Yeongwoo
    Yook, Ju-Min
    Choi, Soon-Youn
    Jung, Hee-Yeon
    Choi, Ji-Young
    Park, Sun-Hee
    Kim, Chan-Duck
    Kim, Yong-Lim
    Cho, Jang-Hee
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [22] Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high-volume online hemodiafiltration-the comPERFORM study
    Ehlerding, Goetz
    Ries, Wolfgang
    Kempkes-Koch, Manuela
    Ziegler, Ekkehard
    Erlenkoetter, Ansgar
    Zawada, Adam M.
    Kennedy, James P.
    Ottillinger, Bertram
    Stauss-Grabo, Manuela
    Lang, Thomas
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (04) : 672 - 680
  • [23] Comparison between On-Line High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration and Conventional High-Flux Hemodialysis for Polyclonal Free Light Chain Removal
    Lamy, Thomas
    Henri, Patrick
    Lobbedez, Thierry
    Comby, Elisabeth
    Ryckelynck, Jean-Philippe
    Ficheux, Maxence
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2014, 37 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [24] Super high-flux continuous hemodialysis in septic shock: A case report
    Madelaine, Thomas
    Page, Mathieu
    Prothet, Johanne
    Ber, Charles-Eric
    Crozon, Julien
    Allaouchiche, Bernard
    Rimmele, Thomas
    NEPHROLOGIE & THERAPEUTIQUE, 2013, 9 (07): : 497 - 500
  • [25] Survival of incident patients on high-volume online hemodiafiltration compared to low-volume online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis
    Imamovic, Goran
    Hrvacevic, Rajko
    Kapun, Sonja
    Marcelli, Daniele
    Bayh, Inga
    Grassmann, Aileen
    Scatizzi, Laura
    Maslovaric, Jelena
    Canaud, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 46 (06) : 1191 - 1200
  • [26] Comparison of survival for super high-flux hemodialysis (SHF-HD) with high albumin leakage versus online hemodiafiltration or SHF-HD with low albumin leakage: the SUPERB study
    Okada, Kazuyoshi
    Tashiro, Manabu
    Michiwaki, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Tomoko
    Shima, Hisato
    Minakuchi, Jun
    Kawashima, Shu
    RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [27] HIGH-FLUX SYNTHETIC VERSUS CELLULOSIC MEMBRANES FOR BETA-2-MICROGLOBULIN REMOVAL DURING HEMODIALYSIS, HEMODIAFILTRATION AND HEMOFILTRATION
    FLOEGE, J
    GRANOLLERAS, C
    DESCHODT, G
    HECK, M
    BAUDIN, G
    BRANGER, B
    TOURNIER, O
    REINHARD, B
    EISENBACH, GM
    SMEBY, LC
    KOCH, KM
    SHALDON, S
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1989, 4 (07) : 653 - 657
  • [28] High-Volume Hemodiafiltration Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review for the Clinician
    Canaud, Bernard
    Strippoli, Giovanni
    Davenport, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (08)
  • [29] Convection-enhanced high-flux hemodialysis
    Lee, Kyungsoo
    Jeong, Jae Hoon
    Mun, Cho Hae
    Lee, Sa Ram
    Yoo, Kyu Jae
    Park, Yong Woo
    Won, Yong Soon
    Min, Byoung Goo
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2007, 31 (08) : 653 - 658
  • [30] High-Flux and Low-Flux Membranes in Hemodialysis
    Oshvandi, Khodayar
    Kavyannejad, Rasol
    Borzuo, Sayed Reza
    Gholyaf, Mahmoud
    NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES, 2014, 3 (03)