Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins

被引:7
|
作者
Belmouaz, Mohamed [1 ]
Goussard, Guillaume [1 ]
Joly, Florent [1 ]
Sibille, Audrey [1 ]
Martin, Cecile [1 ]
Betous, Thomas [1 ]
Thierry, Antoine [1 ]
Bauwens, Marc [1 ]
Bridoux, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Poitiers, France
关键词
Hemodialysis; Hemodiafiltration; Medium cut-off; Super high flux; Kappa and lambda free light chains; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1159/000526891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux (SHF) dialyzers have been implemented to enhance the removal of middle molecules (MM). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different dialysis strategies and dialyzers on small solutes and MM reduction ratio (RR) and mass removal. Methods: We performed a prospective study in 8 HD patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions: seven sessions on HD using either Theranova 500 (TM), Elisio 21H (TM), Renak PS-2.0W (TM), Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM), Vie 21X (TM), TS-2.1UL (TM) or FDY 210-GW (TM) dialyzers and two sessions on OL-HDF using Elisio 21H (TM) or Renak PS-2.0W (TM) dialyzers. Results: Urea mass removal and RR were similar between all dialysis strategies. The lowest beta2-microglobulin RR was achieved with Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM) HD (p < 0.05). Compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD, Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF produced higher beta2-microglobulin mass removal (181 +/- 46 vs. 317 +/- 161 mg, p < 0.05). Theranova 500 (TM) HD, Vie 21X (TM) HD, FDY 210-GW (TM) HD, Elisio 21H (TM) OL-HDF, and Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF induced higher RR for kappa and lambda FLC, as compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD and Filtryzer BK-2.1F (TM) HD (p < 0.05). Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF achieved higher kappa FLC mass removal compared to Elisio 21H (TM) HD (563 +/- 515 vs. 141 +/- 47 mg, p < 0.01) and to Renak PS-2.0W (TM) HD (563 +/- 515 vs. 153 +/- 25 mg, p < 0.05). Albumin loss varied from 0.02 +/- 0.05 to 7.6 +/- 3.8 g/session with Elisio 21H (TM) HD and Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF, respectively. Compared to all other strategies, Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF induced a significantly higher albumin loss (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study confirms that albumin loss and removal of MM are similar using conventional Elisio 21H (TM) OL-HDF, MCO-HD, and SHF type V dialyzers. Although Renak PS-2.0W (TM) OL-HDF provides high performance for MM depuration, this protein-permeable dialyzer should not be used in OL-HDF because of excessive albumin loss.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial
    Belmouaz, Mohamed
    Bauwens, Marc
    Hauet, Thierry
    Bossard, Valentin
    Jamet, Pierre
    Joly, Florent
    Chikhi, Elise
    Joffrion, Sandrine
    Gand, Elise
    Bridoux, Frank
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 (02) : 328 - 335
  • [2] Phosphorus Removal in Low-Flux Hemodialysis, High-Flux Hemodialysis, and Hemodiafiltration
    Svara, Frantisek
    Lopot, Frantisek
    Valkovsky, Ivo
    Pecha, Ondrej
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (02) : 176 - 181
  • [3] Survival Benefit of Hemodiafiltration Compared With Prolonged High-flux Hemodialysis
    Djuric, Petar S.
    Jankovic, Aleksandar
    Popovic, Jovan
    Dragovic, Jelena Tosic
    Bulatovic, Ana
    Djuric, Zivka
    Mitrovic, Milos
    Dimkovic, Nada
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2016, 10 (06) : 388 - 394
  • [4] Comparative metabolomic study of high-flux hemodialysis and high volume online hemodiafiltration in the removal of uremic toxins using 1H NMR spectroscopy
    Santos, Andressa Flores
    Schiefer, Elberth Manfron
    Sassaki, Guilherme Lanzi
    Menezes, Leociley
    Fonseca, Renato
    Cunha, Regiane
    Souza, Wesley
    Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
    Stinghen, Andrea E. M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 208
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness analysis of online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis
    Ramponi, Francesco
    Ronco, Claudio
    Mason, Giacomo
    Rettore, Enrico
    Marcelli, Daniele
    Martino, Francesca
    Neri, Mauro
    Martin-Malo, Alejandro
    Canaud, Bernard
    Locatelli, Francesco
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 8 : 531 - 540
  • [6] Removal capacity of different high-flux dialyzers during postdilution online hemodiafiltration
    Santos Garcia, Alba
    Macias Carmona, Nicolas
    Vega Martinez, Almudena
    Abad Estebanez, Soraya
    Linares Gravalos, Tania
    Aragoncillo Sauco, Ines
    Verdalles Guzman, Ursula
    Panizo Gonzalez, Nayara
    Cruzado Vega, Leonidas
    Lopez Gomez, Juan Manuel
    HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 23 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [7] Evaluation of the efficacy of a medium cut-off dialyser and comparison with other high-flux dialysers in conventional haemodialysis and online haemodiafiltration
    Garcia-Prieto, Ana
    Vega, Almudena
    Linares, Tania
    Abad, Soraya
    Macias, Nicolas
    Aragoncillo, Ines
    Torres, Esther
    Hernandez, Andres
    Barbieri, Diego
    Luno, Jose
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (05) : 742 - 746
  • [8] Efficacy of medium cut-off dialyzers and comparison with high-flux dialyzers in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Jia
    Ke, Guibao
    Liao, Yuanjiang
    Guo, Yong
    Gao, Xiaoling
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2022, 26 (04) : 756 - 768
  • [9] Effects of high albumin leakage on survival between online hemodiafiltration and super high-flux hemodialysis: the HISTORY study
    Okada, Kazuyoshi
    Tashiro, Manabu
    Michiwaki, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Tomoko
    Shima, Hisato
    Minakuchi, Jun
    Kawashima, Shu
    RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [10] Sodium removal and plasma tonicity balance are not different in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration using high-flux membranes
    La Milia, Vincenzo
    Ravasi, Chiara
    Carfagna, Fabio
    Alberghini, Elena
    Baragetti, Ivano
    Buzzi, Laura
    Ferrario, Francesca
    Furiani, Silvia
    Barbone, Gaia Santagostino
    Pontoriero, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 32 (03) : 461 - 469