Exponential information fractal dimension weighted risk priority number method for failure mode and effects analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Ruijie [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Deng, Yong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Inst Fundamental & Frontier Sci, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[2] China Mobile Informat Technol Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA); Risk priority number (RPN); Information fractal dimension; Uncertainty; FMEA; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-023-04912-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As an efficient assessment technique, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) plays a critical role in conducting risk analyses of production and decision-making. In FMEA, the determination of the risk priority number (RPN) is the most important stage used to prioritize potential failure modes. However, the elicited RPN oftentimes contains uncertainty. Information fractal dimension is a measure of uncertainty and complexity for probability distributions. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a novel exponential information fractal dimension weighted RPN (IFDRPN). Probability distributions of assessments are provided by experts. Then, the information fractal dimension is calculated with the consideration of the uncertainty of each piece of assessment information. Furthermore, the relative importance of experts based on variable backgrounds and authorities is also taken into consideration. The corresponding FMEA is capable of measuring uncertainty and complexity in opinions for failure modes to facilitate assessment. An application of rotor blades for an aircraft turbine, along with the risk assessment in hydropower finance project, are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed FMEA approach.
引用
收藏
页码:25058 / 25069
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using a D Numbers Based Multi-Sensor Information Fusion Method
    Deng, Xinyang
    Jiang, Wen
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (09)
  • [32] Risk evaluation in failure mode and effect analysis: AHP-VIKOR method with picture fuzzy rough number
    Mavera Nawaz
    Arooj Adeel
    Muhammad Akram
    Granular Computing, 2024, 9 (3)
  • [33] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) using interval number based BWM-MCDM approach: Risk Expected Value (REV) method
    Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu
    Dey, Vidyut
    Mandal, U. K.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (22) : 12667 - 12688
  • [34] Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Liu, Long
    Liu, Nan
    Mao, Ling-Xiang
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) : 12926 - 12934
  • [35] Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model
    Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu
    Dey, Vidyut
    Mandal, U. K.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 132
  • [36] Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method Based on a Distance Interval Number Operator
    Dong Y.
    You J.
    Duan C.
    Lin H.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2023, 51 (04): : 633 - 642
  • [37] Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty
    Zhang, Zaifang
    Chu, Xuening
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 206 - 214
  • [38] Failure mode and effects analysis to reduce risk of heparin use
    Pino, Felicity A.
    Weidemann, Darcy K.
    Schroeder, Lisa L.
    Pabst, Damon B.
    Kennedy, Audrey R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2019, 76 (23) : 1972 - 1979
  • [39] A new risk prioritization model for failure mode and effects analysis
    Anes, V.
    Henriques, E.
    Freitas, M.
    Reis, L.
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (04) : 516 - 528
  • [40] APPLICATION OF FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT OF A PROJECT
    Paranhos, Mayara de Melo
    Bachega, Stella Jacyszyn
    Tavares, Dalton Matsuo
    Sebba Calife, Naiara Faiad
    SISTEMAS & GESTAO, 2016, 11 (04): : 444 - 454