Aortic Stenosis Progression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Willner, Nadav [1 ]
Prosperi-Porta, Graeme [1 ]
Lau, Lawrence [1 ]
Fu, Angel Yi Nam [1 ]
Boczar, Kevin [1 ]
Poulin, Anthony [1 ]
Di Santo, Pietro [1 ]
Unni, Rudy R. [1 ]
Visintini, Sarah [2 ]
Ronksley, Paul E. [3 ]
Chan, Kwan-Leung [1 ]
Beauchesne, Luc [1 ]
Burwash, Ian G. [1 ]
Messika-Zeitoun, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Dept Cardiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Berkman Lib, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; baseline severity; progression; VALVE CALCIFICATION; SEX-DIFFERENCES; HEMODYNAMIC SEVERITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RISK; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.10.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic valve stenosis is a progressive disorder with variable progression rates. The factors affecting aortic stenosis (AS) progression remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine AS progression rates and to assess the impact of baseline AS severity and sex on disease progression. METHODS The authors searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 1, 2020, for prospective studies evaluating the progression of AS with the use of echocardiography (mean gradient [MG], peak velocity [PV], peak gradient [PG], or aortic valve area [AVA]) or computed tomography (calcium score [AVC]). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the rate of AS progression for each parameter stratified by baseline severity, and meta-regression was performed to determine the impact of baseline severity and of sex on AS progression rate. RESULTS A total of 24 studies including 5,450 patients (40% female) met inclusion criteria. The pooled annualized progression of MG was +4.10 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.80-5.41 mm Hg), AVA -0.08 cm(2) (95% CI: 0.06-0.10 cm(2)), PV +0.19 m/s (95% CI: 0.13-0.24 m/s), PG +7.86 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.98-10.75 mm Hg), and AVC +158.5 AU (95% CI: 55.0-261.9 AU). Increasing baseline severity of AS was predictive of higher rates of progression for MG (P < 0.001), PV (P = 0.001), and AVC (P < 0.001), but not AVA (P = 0.34) or PG (P = 0.21). Only 4 studies reported AS progression stratified by sex, with only PV and AVC having 3 studies to perform a meta-analysis. No difference between sex was observed for PV (P = 0.397) or AVC (P = 0.572), but the level of confidence was low. CONCLUSIONS This study provides progression rates for both hemodynamic and anatomic parameters of AS and shows that increasing hemodynamic and anatomic baseline severity is associated with faster AS progression. More studies are needed to determine if sex differences affect AS progression. (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 328
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AORTIC STENOSIS BASELINE SEVERITY PREDICTS PROGRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Prosperi-Porta, Graeme
    Willner, Nadav
    Unni, Rudy R.
    Lau, Lawrence
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Chan, Kwan
    Beauchesne, Luc Michael
    Burwash, Ian G.
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1967 - 1967
  • [2] Predicting Disease Progression and Mortality in Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Imaging Biomarkers and Meta-Analysis
    Nchimi, Alain
    Dibato, John E.
    Davin, Laurent
    Schoysman, Laurent
    Oury, Cecile
    Lancellotti, Patrizio
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 5
  • [3] Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsampasian, Vasiliki
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Ramos, Abraham Edgar Gracia
    Asimakopoulos, George
    Garg, Pankaj
    Prasad, Sanjay
    Ring, Liam
    McCann, Gerry P.
    Rudd, James
    Dweck, Marc R.
    Vassiliou, Vassilios S.
    OPEN HEART, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [4] Aortic valve intervention for aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Campos, Diana
    Saleiro, Carolina
    Botelho, Ana
    Costa, Marco
    Goncalves, Lino
    Teixeira, Rogerio
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (06) : 477 - 486
  • [5] The outcomes of fetal aortic valvuloplasty in critical aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mendel, Brian
    Kohar, Kelvin
    Amirah, Shakira
    Vidya, Ananda Pipphali
    Utama, Karen Elliora
    Prakoso, Radityo
    Siagian, Sisca Natalia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 382 : 106 - 111
  • [6] Concomitant Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sleiman, Jose
    Khan, Mohammad S.
    Usman, Muhammad S.
    Munoz, Ezequiel
    Ranka, Sagar
    Muhammad, Hassan N.
    Ijeli, Anthonia
    Fatima, Kaneez
    Raza, Sajjad
    Deo, Salil
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [7] Bedside Physical Examination for the Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shellenberger, Richard A.
    Crass, Stephanie
    Jevicks, Justin
    Badhwar, Ankita
    Albright, Jeremy
    Kumar, Agara
    CJC OPEN, 2023, 5 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [8] Aortic stenosis and non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Lavi, Ronit
    Cibelli, Mario
    de Belder, Mark A.
    Moat, Neil
    Hildick-Smith, David
    Ludman, Peter
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 240 : 145 - 153
  • [9] Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sen, Jonathan
    Chung, Erin
    Neil, Christopher
    Marwick, Thomas
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [10] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chan, J. S. K.
    Harky, A.
    Singh, S.
    Eriksen, P.
    Tsui, L. H.
    Abdulsalam, A.
    Field, M.
    Nawaytou, O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 34 - 34