Aortic Stenosis Progression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:29
作者
Willner, Nadav [1 ]
Prosperi-Porta, Graeme [1 ]
Lau, Lawrence [1 ]
Fu, Angel Yi Nam [1 ]
Boczar, Kevin [1 ]
Poulin, Anthony [1 ]
Di Santo, Pietro [1 ]
Unni, Rudy R. [1 ]
Visintini, Sarah [2 ]
Ronksley, Paul E. [3 ]
Chan, Kwan-Leung [1 ]
Beauchesne, Luc [1 ]
Burwash, Ian G. [1 ]
Messika-Zeitoun, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Dept Cardiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Berkman Lib, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; baseline severity; progression; VALVE CALCIFICATION; SEX-DIFFERENCES; HEMODYNAMIC SEVERITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RISK; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.10.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic valve stenosis is a progressive disorder with variable progression rates. The factors affecting aortic stenosis (AS) progression remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine AS progression rates and to assess the impact of baseline AS severity and sex on disease progression. METHODS The authors searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 1, 2020, for prospective studies evaluating the progression of AS with the use of echocardiography (mean gradient [MG], peak velocity [PV], peak gradient [PG], or aortic valve area [AVA]) or computed tomography (calcium score [AVC]). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the rate of AS progression for each parameter stratified by baseline severity, and meta-regression was performed to determine the impact of baseline severity and of sex on AS progression rate. RESULTS A total of 24 studies including 5,450 patients (40% female) met inclusion criteria. The pooled annualized progression of MG was +4.10 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.80-5.41 mm Hg), AVA -0.08 cm(2) (95% CI: 0.06-0.10 cm(2)), PV +0.19 m/s (95% CI: 0.13-0.24 m/s), PG +7.86 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.98-10.75 mm Hg), and AVC +158.5 AU (95% CI: 55.0-261.9 AU). Increasing baseline severity of AS was predictive of higher rates of progression for MG (P < 0.001), PV (P = 0.001), and AVC (P < 0.001), but not AVA (P = 0.34) or PG (P = 0.21). Only 4 studies reported AS progression stratified by sex, with only PV and AVC having 3 studies to perform a meta-analysis. No difference between sex was observed for PV (P = 0.397) or AVC (P = 0.572), but the level of confidence was low. CONCLUSIONS This study provides progression rates for both hemodynamic and anatomic parameters of AS and shows that increasing hemodynamic and anatomic baseline severity is associated with faster AS progression. More studies are needed to determine if sex differences affect AS progression. (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 328
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Sex Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Aortic Stenosis
    Aggarwal, Shivani R.
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    Cueff, Caroline
    Malouf, Joseph
    Araoz, Philip A.
    Mankad, Rekha
    Michelena, Hector
    Vahanian, Alec
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [2] Baumgartner H, 2017, J AM SOC ECHOCARDIOG, V30, P372, DOI [10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009, 10.1093/ehjci/jew335]
  • [3] Population-Wide Trends in Aortic Stenosis Incidence and Outcomes
    Bonow, Robert O.
    Greenland, Philip
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2015, 131 (11) : 969 - 971
  • [4] Biomarkers of mineral metabolism and progression of aortic valve and mitral annular calcification: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
    Bortnick, Anna E.
    Xu, Shuo
    Kim, Ryung S.
    Kestenbaum, Bryan
    Ix, Joachim H.
    Jenny, Nancy S.
    de Boer, Ian H.
    Michos, Erin D.
    Thanassoulis, George
    Siscovick, David S.
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    Kizer, Jorge R.
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2019, 285 : 79 - 86
  • [5] Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Progression of Aortic Stenosis Influence of Age and Statin Therapy
    Capoulade, Romain
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    Chan, Kwan L.
    Teo, Koon K.
    Tam, James W.
    Cote, Nancy
    Mathieu, Patrick
    Despres, Jean-Pierre
    Pibarot, Philippe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (03) : 216 - 223
  • [6] Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Burwash, Ian G.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 10 (02) : 185 - 202
  • [7] A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis
    Cowell, SJ
    Newby, DE
    Prescott, RJ
    Bloomfield, P
    Reid, J
    Northridge, DB
    Boon, NA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) : 2389 - 2397
  • [8] Sex differences in cardiovascular outcome during progression of aortic valve stenosis
    Cramariuc, Dana
    Rogge, Barbara Patricia
    Lonnebakken, Mai Tone
    Boman, Kurt
    Bahlmann, Edda
    Gohlke-Baerwolf, Christa
    Chambers, John B.
    Pedersen, Terje R.
    Gerdts, Eva
    [J]. HEART, 2015, 101 (03) : 209 - 214
  • [9] Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction
    Cueff, Caroline
    Serfaty, Jean-Michel
    Cimadevilla, Claire
    Laissy, Jean-Pierre
    Himbert, Dominique
    Tubach, Florence
    Duval, Xavier
    Iung, Bernard
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    Vahanian, Alec
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    [J]. HEART, 2011, 97 (09) : 721 - 726
  • [10] Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: is there a common link with calcification and inflammation?
    Dweck, Marc R.
    Khaw, H. J.
    Sng, G. K. Z.
    Luo, E. L. C.
    Baird, A.
    Williams, M. C.
    Makiello, P.
    Mirsadraee, S.
    Joshi, N. V.
    van Beek, E. J. R.
    Boon, N. A.
    Rudd, J. H. F.
    Newby, D. E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (21) : 1567 - 1574