Price limit performance: New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China's ChiNext market

被引:7
作者
Tang, Siyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Price limits; Price manipulation; Market efficiency; Emerging market; INVESTOR SENTIMENT; CIRCUIT-BREAKERS; STOCK MARKETS; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; CHOICE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102747
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of daily price limits on market performance and trading activity by using a quasinatural experiment in China. It focuses on the case of the ChiNext market, where the daily price limits of stocks increased from 10% to 20% in 2020. The results show that, initially, the stock prices and occurrences of 10% price limit hits increase, but then decline after the new price limits have been implemented. The level of trading liquidity and volatility increases significantly, with a greater impact on the short term than the long term. These price limit performances are more pronounced for stocks with additional retail interest. The analysis of detailed trading data reveals that institutional investors initially purchase ChiNext stocks in large quantities, followed by retail investors who purchase smaller quantities. In the long run, institutional investors tend to increase their holdings, while retail investors tend to sell their holdings. Additionally, there is a temporary increase in investor attention, price synchronicity, and stock risks, followed by a decline. The findings suggest that wider price limits increase trading volumes and enhance long-term market efficiency, but encourage immediate price manipulation, causing short-term overreactions and long-term reversals. This study provides valuable insights for building an effective price limit system.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Ackert L.F., 1994, Review of Financial Economics, V4, P93, DOI DOI 10.1016/1058-3300(94)90008-6
[2]   Investor sentiment and price limit rules [J].
Ackert, Lucy F. ;
Huang, Yaru ;
Jiang, Lei .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2015, 5 :15-26
[3]   Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects [J].
Amihud, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2002, 5 (01) :31-56
[4]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Regulatory reform of stock and futures markets, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2193-19
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Economic Notes, DOI DOI 10.1111/1468-0300.00006
[7]   Investor sentiment in the stock market [J].
Baker, Malcolm ;
Wurgler, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (02) :129-151
[8]  
Berkman H., 2002, PACIFIC BASIN FINANC, V10, P517, DOI [10.1016/S0927-538X(02)00040-9, DOI 10.1016/S0927-538X(02)00040-9]
[9]   Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q [J].
Bharadwaj, AS ;
Bharadwaj, SG ;
Konsynski, BR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) :1008-1024
[10]   A THEORY OF PRICE LIMITS IN FUTURES MARKETS [J].
BRENNAN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 16 (02) :213-233