How to mend the dormant user in Q&A communities? A social cognitive theory-based study of consistent geeks of StackOverflow

被引:10
作者
Mustafa, Sohaib [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Naveed, Muhammad Mateen [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consistent geeks; low participation; knowledge contribution; Q&A communities; GMM; SELF-DISCLOSURE; CONVERSATIONAL AGENT; NEWS; MEDIA; WILLINGNESS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; COMPANY; HUMANS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2023.2237604
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Low user participation and less knowledge contribution seriously threaten the sustainability of online question and answers communities. Although researchers studied the different aspects of knowledge contribution and proposed useful suggestions, there is still no thorough study on the knowledge contribution pattern of consistent geeks' that can help improve low participation. According to social cognitive and self-determination theory, peers follow credible sources or role models in their participation patterns and are influenced by the community environment. Based on social cognitive and self-determination theory, we have studied the most consistent geeks of StackOverflow for the period between 2010-2020 to employ the results to activate dormant users. Two-step system GMM results revealed that most users take a free ride and hesitate to reciprocate; knowledge-seeking negatively influences the quantity of contributed knowledge. Peer recognition and repudiation positively influence the knowledge contribution of active geeks, whereas reputation scores and badges negatively influence the contributed knowledge's quantity and quality. Social interaction's role as moderator is also different for quantity and quality of knowledge contributed. Study results improve the existing literature and provide comprehensive managerial implications to improve low participation and create a progressive knowledge contribution environment.
引用
收藏
页码:2024 / 2043
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior [J].
Anderson, Eileen S. ;
Winett, Richard A. ;
Wojcik, Janet R. .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 34 (03) :304-312
[2]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[3]  
Bandura A., 1968, Social foundations of thought and action, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0813483900008238
[4]   Towards a common renewable future: The System-GMM approach to assess the convergence in renewable energy consumption of EU countries [J].
Berk, Istemi ;
Kasman, Adnan ;
Kilinc, Dilara .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 87
[5]  
Bond SR, 2002, Port. Econ. J, V1, P141, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10258-002-0009-9, 10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9]
[6]   Copresence: Revisiting a Building Block for Social Interaction Theories [J].
Campos-Castillo, Celeste ;
Hitlin, Steven .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2013, 31 (02) :168-192
[7]   Assessing Technical Candidates on the Social Web [J].
Capiluppi, Andrea ;
Serebrenik, Alexander ;
Singer, Leif .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2013, 30 (01) :45-51
[8]   How do Virtual Badges Incentivize Voluntary Contributions to Online Communities? [J].
Cavusoglu, Huseyin ;
Li, Zhuolun ;
Kim, Seung Hyun .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (05)
[9]  
Chen L., 2021, DECIS SUPPORT SYST
[10]   Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community [J].
Chen, Langtao ;
Baird, Aaron ;
Straub, Detmar .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 118 :21-32