Patterns, drivers, and a predictive model of dam removal cost in the United States

被引:8
|
作者
Duda, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Jumani, Suman [2 ,3 ]
Wieferich, Daniel J. [4 ]
Tullos, Desiree [5 ]
McKay, S. Kyle [2 ]
Randle, Timothy J. [6 ]
Jansen, Alvin [6 ]
Bailey, Susan [2 ]
Jensen, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Johnson, Rachelle C. [1 ]
Wagner, Ella [1 ]
Richards, Kyla [4 ]
Wenger, Seth J. [3 ]
Walther, Eric J. [3 ]
Bountry, Jennifer A. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Western Fisheries Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] US Army Corps Engn, Environm Lab, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[3] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Sci Analyt & Synth, Denver, CO USA
[5] Oregon State Univ, Biol & Ecol Engn Dept, Corvallis, OR USA
[6] Tech Serv Ctr, Bur Reclamat, Denver, CO USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
dam removal; cost drivers; economics; river restoration; cost engineering; ALTERED FLOW REGIMES; ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES; SCIENCE; RIVER; CONNECTIVITY; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; DECISIONS; POLITICS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1215471
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Given the burgeoning dam removal movement and the large number of dams approaching obsolescence in the United States, cost estimating data and tools are needed for dam removal prioritization, planning, and execution. We used the list of removed dams compiled by American Rivers to search for publicly available reported costs for dam removal projects. Total cost information could include component costs related to project planning, dam deconstruction, monitoring, and several categories of mitigation activities. We compiled reported costs from 455 unique sources for 668 dams removed in the United States from 1965 to 2020. The dam removals occurred within 571 unique projects involving 1-18 dams. When adjusted for inflation into 2020 USD, cost of these projects totaled $1.522 billion, with per-dam costs ranging from $1 thousand (k) to $268.8 million (M). The median cost for dam removals was $157k, $823k, and $6.2M for dams that were< 5 m, between 5-10 m, and > 10 m in height, respectively. Geographic differences in total costs showed that northern states in general, and the Pacific Northwest in particular, spent the most on dam removal. The Midwest and the Northeast spent proportionally more on removal of dams less than 5 m in height, whereas the Northwest and Southwest spent the most on larger dam removals > 10 m tall. We used stochastic gradient boosting with quantile regression to model dam removal cost against potential predictor variables including dam characteristics (dam height and material), hydrography (average annual discharge and drainage area), project complexity (inferred from construction and sediment management, mitigation, and post-removal cost drivers), and geographic region. Dam height, annual average discharge at the dam site, and project complexity were the predominant drivers of removal cost. The final model had an R-2 of 57% and when applied to a test dataset model predictions had a root mean squared error of $5.09M and a mean absolute error of $1.45M, indicating its potential utility to predict estimated costs of dam removal. We developed a R shiny application for estimating dam removal costs using customized model inputs for exploratory analyses and potential dam removal planning.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unmasking healthcare supply chain cost drivers in the United States
    Essila, Jean C.
    Motwani, Jaideep
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (04) : 1350 - 1382
  • [2] Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States
    Ryan Bellmore, J.
    Duda, Jeffrey J.
    Craig, Laura S.
    Greene, Samantha L.
    Torgersen, Christian E.
    Collins, Mathias J.
    Vittum, Katherine
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2017, 4 (02):
  • [3] Effects of Stronach Dam removal on fluvial geomorphology in the Pine River, Michigan, United States
    Burroughs, Bryan A.
    Hayes, Daniel B.
    Klomp, Kristi D.
    Hansen, Jonathan F.
    Mistak, Jessica
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2009, 110 (3-4) : 96 - 107
  • [4] Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States
    Sertkaya, Aylin
    Wong, Hui-Hsing
    Jessup, Amber
    Beleche, Trinidad
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [5] Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States
    Foley, Melissa M.
    Magilligan, Francis J.
    Torgersen, Christian E.
    Major, Jon J.
    Anderson, Chauncey W.
    Connolly, Patrick J.
    Wieferich, Daniel
    Shafroth, Patrick B.
    Evans, James E.
    Infante, Dana
    Craig, Laura S.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [6] Beyond Mandatory Fishways: Federal Hydropower Relicensing as a Window of Opportunity for Dam Removal and Adaptive Governance of Riverine Landscapes in the United States
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Gosnell, Hannah
    WATER ALTERNATIVES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON WATER POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (03): : 819 - 839
  • [7] Prioritizing dams for removal to advance restoration and conservation efforts in the western United States
    Guetz, Katie
    Joyal, Taylor
    Dickson, Brett
    Perry, Denielle
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)
  • [8] Patterns and drivers for wetland connections in the Prairie Pothole Region, United States
    Melanie K. Vanderhoof
    Jay R. Christensen
    Laurie C. Alexander
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2017, 25 : 275 - 297
  • [9] Patterns and drivers for wetland connections in the Prairie Pothole Region, United States
    Vanderhoof, Melanie K.
    Christensen, Jay R.
    Alexander, Laurie C.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 25 (03) : 275 - 297
  • [10] Cost allocation in dam removal project
    Tanimoto, K
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 3308 - 3313