Exploring Personality and Learning Motivation Influences on Students' Computational Thinking Skills in Introductory Programming Courses

被引:3
作者
Kaur, Amanpreet [1 ]
Chahal, Kuljit Kaur [1 ]
机构
[1] Guru Nanak Dev Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Amritsar, Punjab, India
关键词
Computational thinking; Personality traits; Motivation; Introductory programming course; Structural equation modeling; FIT INDEXES; SUGGESTIONS; MATHEMATICS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; VALIDITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-023-10052-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Computational thinking (CT) is an essential skill required for every individual in the digital era to become creative problem solvers. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationships between computational thinking skills, the Big Five personality factors, and learning motivation using structural equation modeling (SEM). The research administered the computational thinking scale, NEO FFI scale, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire to a sample of 92 students pursuing degrees in Computer Science and Engineering. Based on the result analysis, it was determined that both personality and learning motivation had positive and significant impacts on computation thinking skills. Personality had a major contribution to the prediction of CT, with consciousness being the most influential predictor. The findings of this study suggest that educators and academics should focus on the significance of the psychological side of CT for the improvement of students' CT skills.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 792
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]  
Moreno-León J, 2018, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C, P1684, DOI 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363437
[52]   Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance [J].
O'Connor, Melissa C. ;
Paunonen, Sampo V. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (05) :971-990
[53]   RELIABILITY AND PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE MOTIVATED STRATEGIES FOR LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE (MSLQ) [J].
PINTRICH, PR ;
SMITH, DAF ;
GARCIA, T ;
MCKEACHIE, WJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 53 (03) :801-813
[54]   Psychological Correlates of University Students' Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Richardson, Michelle ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Bond, Rod .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 138 (02) :353-387
[55]  
Roberts T.G., 2005, J AGR ED, V446, P12, DOI DOI 10.5032/JAE.2005.02012
[56]  
Roman-Gonzalez M., 2016, P 4 INT C TECHN EC E, P51
[57]   Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors [J].
Roman-Gonzalez, Marcos ;
Perez-Gonzalez, Juan-Carlos ;
Moreno-Leon, Jesus ;
Robles, Gregorio .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 80 :441-459
[58]   Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test [J].
Roman-Gonzalez, Marcos ;
Perez-Gonzalez, Juan-Carlos ;
Jimenez-Fernandez, Carmen .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 72 :678-691
[59]   Computational thinking development through creative programming in higher education [J].
Romero, Margarida ;
Lepage, Alexandre ;
Lille, Benjamin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 14
[60]  
Schumacker RE., 2010, A beginner's guide to structural equation modelling, V3