Forum: Navigating the Global South Landscape: Insights and Implications for Representation and Inclusion in ISA Journals

被引:4
作者
Chagas-Bastos, Fabricio H. [1 ,2 ]
Resende, Erica [3 ]
Ghosn, Faten [4 ]
Lisle, Debbie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Denmark Univ Sao Paulo, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Brazilian War Coll, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[4] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Global South; sociology of science; International Studies Association; inclusion; diversity; INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS THEORY; SOCIOLOGY; AMERICAN; POLITICS; DIALOGUE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1093/isp/ekad010
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The International Studies Association (ISA) is widely recognized as an American-European-centric professional organization, with Global South scholars traditionally representing a minority of its membership. This pattern largely reflects the development of the International Relations (IR) discipline and its publication trends. In this Forum, we examine the progress made in the representation of Global South scholars within the IR discipline over the past decade, specifically focusing on the ISA as the primary professional body for IR scholars. We tackle some issues the Global South Task Force (GSTF) highlighted to a more assertive representativeness of the Global South within the ISA. Our analysis concentrates on ISA's journals data tracking to capture the current state of affairs and foster dialogue on developing inventive solutions to enhance diversity, intellectual plurality, and scholarly cultures within the IR discipline. Rather than resorting to outright criticism, we adopt a constructive stance, discussing attempted solutions and proposing steps to advance the discipline.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 466
页数:26
相关论文
共 48 条