Preferences and perceptions of students about the degree in Social Work

被引:0
作者
Martinez, Juana Maria Morcillo [1 ]
Ramirez, Maria Victoria Ochando [2 ]
Salvador, Isabel Maria Martinez [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Psychol, Area Social Work & Social Serv, Bldg C5,Off 128, Jaen, Spain
[2] Int Univ La Rioja, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Logrono, Spain
[3] Univ Almeria, Dept Psychol, Area Social Work & Social Serv, Almeria, Spain
关键词
Perception; Social Work; university; quality of education; student body; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SERVICE QUALITY; SATISFACTION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/02615479.2023.2194311
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Social Work Degree prepares students for their future professional practice. Considering the students' point of view helps to gather their impressions. It also makes it possible to improve and make teaching and institutional decisions. The aim of this study is to explore the perceived quality of the students of the Degree in Social Work taught in the Public Universities of the Autonomous Community of Andalusia (Spain). For this purpose, we have chosen to carry out an exploratory study with a qualitative approach. A non-probabilistic sample of 73 participants made up of students from various courses was used. The instrument used was a questionnaire of open questions elaborated in Microsoft Forms and distributed telematically. The results show a high level of satisfaction with the Social Work studies received. The opinions have made it possible to extract categories of analysis on overall satisfaction, methodology, content, teaching staff, and the link between training and professional practice. The study show which dimensions they consider to contribute quality to their studies, showing a preference for practical issues. They emphasize their interest in participatory teaching methodologies, updated content and teaching staff who are involved in their teaching practice that will enable their future professional practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1515
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared [J].
Abdullah, Firdaus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) :71-89
[2]  
Aguilera Jimenez A., 2017, REV FUENTES, V19, P57, DOI [https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2018.v20.i1.04, DOI 10.12795/REVISTAFUENTES.2017.19.1.03]
[3]   Characteristics of educational quality assurance: A systematic mapping 2016-2020 [J].
Alejandra Ruiz-Ramirez, Jessica ;
David Glasserman-Morales, Leonardo .
REVISTA COMPLUTENSE DE EDUCACION, 2021, 32 (03) :337-348
[4]  
Alvarez Tay Rosa Carolina, 2021, Ind. data, V24, P23, DOI 10.15381/idata.v24i1.17749
[5]  
Aneca, 2004, LIBR BLANC GRAD TRAB
[6]  
Aneca, 2012, GUIA AP EL MEM VER T
[7]  
Aneca, 2011, PROT EV VER TIT U OF
[8]  
Minguet PA, 2009, REV EDUC-MADRID, P219
[9]  
Barranco Exposito C., 2004, ALTERNATIVAS CUADERN, V12, P79, DOI [https://doi.org/10.14198/ALTERN2004.12.5, DOI 10.14198/ALTERN2004.12.5]
[10]  
Bayraktaroglu G., 2017, TAYLOR FRANCIS ONLIN, V17, P47, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2010.11918260, DOI 10.1080/10686967.2010.11918260]