Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Hsu, Chi-Pin [1 ]
Wu, Chen-Te [4 ]
Chen, Chao-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, High Speed 3D Printing Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthpaed Surg,Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst BioMed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Glenoid version; Glenoid inclination; 3D preoperative planning; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Centerline; PATIENT-SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; COMPONENT; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INCLINATION; SELECTION; SURGEON; EROSION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. Materials and methods Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. Results The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63 degrees +/- 6.60 (2.87 degrees +/- 5.97) and -1.96 degrees +/- 4.24 (-3.21 degrees +/- 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10 degrees was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). Conclusion The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (+/- 10 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:4065 / 4075
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Specific 3D Printed Models of Renal Tumours Using Home-Made 3D Printer in Comparison with Commercial 3D Printer
    Liu, Dongting
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Chaichana, Thanapong
    Ducke, Werner
    Fan, Zhanming
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2018, 8 (02) : 303 - 308
  • [42] Low Dose Computed Tomography for 3D Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Image Quality
    Huppertz, Alexander
    Lembcke, Alexander
    Sariali, El-hadi
    Durmus, Tahir
    Schwenke, Carsten
    Hamm, Bernd
    Sparmann, Martin
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (05) : 649 - 656
  • [43] Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma
    Mishra, Abhishek
    Verma, Tarun
    Vaish, Abhishek
    Vaish, Riya
    Vaishya, Raju
    Maini, Lalit
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 22 (06) : 350 - 355
  • [44] Accuracy of 3D printed guide for orbital implant
    Kwon, Jaeyoung
    Kim, Guk
    Kang, Sunah
    Byeon, Younghwa
    Sa, Ho-Seok
    Kim, Namkug
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (08) : 1363 - 1370
  • [45] The application of 3D printing patient specific instrumentation model in total knee arthroplasty
    Zhou, Fengxin
    Xue, Feng
    Zhang, Shuquan
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (05) : 1217 - 1221
  • [46] Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review
    Kumar, Prasoon
    Vatsya, Pulak
    Rajnish, Rajesh Kumar
    Hooda, Aman
    Dhillon, Mandeep S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 55 (SUPPL 1) : 14 - 26
  • [47] 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Mu, Min
    Yan, Jiazhen
    Han, Bo
    Ye, Rui
    Guo, Gang
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 11
  • [48] 3D-VUPID: 3D Visual Urban Planning Integrated Data
    Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluisa
    Boada-Oliveras, Immaculada
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2013, PT IV, 2013, 7974 : 17 - 32
  • [49] From CD to 3D - Sidewall roughness analysis with 3D CD-AFM
    Foucher, J
    Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX, Pts 1-3, 2005, 5752 : 966 - 976
  • [50] Micro-CT analysis of 3D printed provisional crowns fitting
    Alsubaiy, Ebrahim Fihaid
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (01) : 259 - 268