Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Hsu, Chi-Pin [1 ]
Wu, Chen-Te [4 ]
Chen, Chao-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, High Speed 3D Printing Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthpaed Surg,Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst BioMed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Glenoid version; Glenoid inclination; 3D preoperative planning; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Centerline; PATIENT-SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; COMPONENT; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INCLINATION; SELECTION; SURGEON; EROSION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. Materials and methods Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. Results The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63 degrees +/- 6.60 (2.87 degrees +/- 5.97) and -1.96 degrees +/- 4.24 (-3.21 degrees +/- 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10 degrees was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). Conclusion The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (+/- 10 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:4065 / 4075
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of 3D printed osteotomy guide plate-assisted total knee arthroplasty in treatment of valgus knee deformity
    Shen, Zhimin
    Wang, Hong
    Duan, Yiqiang
    Wang, Jian
    Wang, Fengyan
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [22] 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty
    Ettinger, Max
    Claassen, Leif
    Paes, Peter
    Calliess, Tilman
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (01): : 149 - 151
  • [23] Reliable prediction of implant size and axial alignment in AI-based 3D preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty
    Lan, Qing
    Li, Shulin
    Zhang, Jiahao
    Guo, Huiling
    Yan, Laipeng
    Tang, Faqiang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] A comparison between 3D printed models and standard 2D planning in the use of metal block augments in revision knee arthroplasty
    Balato, Giovanni
    De Matteo, Vincenzo
    Guarino, Amedeo
    De Mauro, Domenico
    Baldi, Dario
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    Salvatore, Marco
    Citak, Mustafa
    Mariconda, Massimo
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 35 (03): : 473 - 482
  • [25] 3D printing in shoulder surgery
    Campana, Vincenzo
    Cardona, Valentina
    Vismara, Valeria
    Monteleone, Andrea Stefano
    Piazza, Piero
    Messinese, Piermarco
    Mocini, Fabrizio
    Sircana, Giuseppe
    Maccauro, Giulio
    Saccomanno, Maristella Francesca
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2020, 12 : 95 - 99
  • [26] Comparison of 3D computer-assisted planning with and without patient-specific instrumentation for severe bone defects in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Yelton, Mitchell J.
    Da Silva, Adrik Z.
    Moverman, Michael A.
    Joyce, Christopher D.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (12) : 2629 - 2636
  • [27] 3D Printed Dental Models A comparative analysis
    Tancu, Ana Maria Cristina
    Pantea, Mihaela
    Totan, Alexandra
    Tanase, Mihaela
    Imre, Marina
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2019, 56 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [28] Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    Haupt, Edward
    Leonor, Thiago
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    King, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (11) : 2257 - 2263
  • [29] 3D Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Jig for Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Mishra, Abhishek
    Verma, Tarun
    Rajkumar
    Agarwal, Gaurang
    Sharma, Amit
    Maini, Lalit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 54 (02) : 174 - 180
  • [30] 3D Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Jig for Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Abhishek Mishra
    Tarun Verma
    Gaurang Rajkumar
    Amit Agarwal
    Lalit Sharma
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2020, 54 : 174 - 180