Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Hsu, Chi-Pin [1 ]
Wu, Chen-Te [4 ]
Chen, Chao-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, High Speed 3D Printing Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthpaed Surg,Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst BioMed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Glenoid version; Glenoid inclination; 3D preoperative planning; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Centerline; PATIENT-SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; COMPONENT; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INCLINATION; SELECTION; SURGEON; EROSION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. Materials and methods Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. Results The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63 degrees +/- 6.60 (2.87 degrees +/- 5.97) and -1.96 degrees +/- 4.24 (-3.21 degrees +/- 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10 degrees was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). Conclusion The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (+/- 10 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:4065 / 4075
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty
    Chi-Pin Hsu
    Chen-Te Wu
    Chao-Yu Chen
    Shang-Chih Lin
    Kuo-Yao Hsu
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 4065 - 4075
  • [2] 3D fluoroscopic navigated reaming of the glenoid for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)
    Briem, Daniel
    Ruecker, Andreas H.
    Neumann, Joerg
    Gebauer, Matthias
    Kendoff, Daniel
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    Schumacher, Udo
    Rueger, Johannes. M.
    Grossterlinden, Lars G.
    COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY, 2011, 16 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [3] Concordance of Preoperative 3D Templating in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Rechenmacher, Albert J.
    Goltz, Daniel E.
    Wickman, John R.
    Levin, Jay M.
    Schappe, Tyler
    Green, Cynthia L.
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    Lassiter, Tally E.
    Anakwenze, Oke A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (19) : E1269 - E1278
  • [4] Variability in total shoulder arthroplasty planning software compared to a control CT-derived 3D printed scapula
    Shah, Sarav S.
    Sahota, Shawn
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Hartzler, Robert U.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2021, 13 (03) : 268 - 275
  • [5] Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning
    Wittmann, Thomas
    Befrui, Nima
    Rieger, Tim
    Raiss, Patric
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 3735 - 3741
  • [6] What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Lilley, Brendan M.
    Lachance, Andrew
    Peebles, Annalise M.
    Powell, Sarah N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (05) : 1073 - 1082
  • [7] Reduction of scapulohumeral subluxation with posterior augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: Short-term 3D comparison between pre- and post-operative CT
    Terrier, Alexandre
    Goetti, Patrick
    Becce, Fabio
    Farron, Alain
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (04) : 681 - 686
  • [8] Computerized 3D morphological analysis of glenoid orientation
    Ghafurian, Soheil
    Galdi, Balazs
    Bastian, Sevag
    Tan, Virak
    Li, Kang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (04) : 692 - 698
  • [9] Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Gauci, Marc-Olivier
    Glevarec, Laure
    Bronsard, Nicolas
    Cointat, Caroline
    Pelletier, Yann
    Boileau, Pascal
    Gonzalez, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (08) : 1771 - 1780
  • [10] Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients
    Van Haver, Annemieke
    Heylen, Steven
    Vuylsteke, Kristien
    Declercq, Geert
    Verborgt, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (04) : 632 - 640